Central West Group Apprentices Ltd v Barrett

Link copied
Case Copied 27 min read
WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION
DETERMINATION OF APPEAL AGAINST A DECISION OF THE COMMISSION CONSTITUTED BY AN ARBITRATOR
CITATION: Central West Group Apprentices Ltd v Barrett [2008] NSWWCCPD 137
APPELLANT: Central West Group Apprentices Ltd
RESPONDENT: Mark Thomas Barrett
INSURER: Allianz Australia Workers Compensation (NSW) Limited
FILE NUMBER: WCC8933-07
DATE OF ARBITRATOR’S DECISION: 22 August 2008
DATE OF APPEAL DECISION: 20 November 2008
SUBJECT MATTER OF DECISION: Lump sum compensation; multiple post 31 December 2001 injurious events; circumstances in which the effects of multiple injurious events may be aggregated to meet the threshold for compensation under section 67 of the Workers Compensation Act 1987; section 322 of the Workplace Injury Management and Workers Compensation Act 1998
PRESIDENTIAL MEMBER: Deputy President Bill Roche
HEARING: On the papers
REPRESENTATION: Appellant: Ellison Tillyard Callanan
Respondent: White Barnes
ORDERS MADE ON APPEAL:

Paragraphs one and two of the Arbitrator’s determination of 22 August 2008 are revoked and the following orders made:

“1.The Applicant sustained the same injury to his lumbar spine arising out of or in the course of his employment with the Respondent in incidents on 8 April 2003 and 25 January 2005. As a result, under section 322(2) of the Workplace Injury Management and Workers Compensation Act 1998, his impairments, assessed by an Approved Medical Specialist in a Medical Assessment Certificate dated 11 March 2008, are to be assessed together.

2.   The Respondent is to pay the Applicant the following lump sum compensation:

(i) $15,000 under section 66 of the Workers Compensation Act 1987 in respect of a 12% whole person impairment made up as follows: 6% permanent impairment as a result of the incident on 8 April 2003 and 6% permanent impairment as a result of the incident on 25 January 2005;

(ii) $12,500 under section 67 of the Workers Compensation Act 1987 in respect of pain and suffering.

3.  The orders made in paragraph 2 of the Certificate of Determination of 10 June 2008 and in paragraph 2(i) above will be satisfied on the payment of $15,000, if that has not already been paid.”

Paragraphs three and four of the Arbitrator’s determination of 22 August 2008 are confirmed.

The appellant employer is to pay the respondent worker’s costs of the appeal.

INTRODUCTION

  1. This appeal concerns the circumstances in which the effects of two work incidents may be aggregated to meet the threshold for the recovery of compensation in section 67 of the Workers Compensation Act 1987 (‘the 1987 Act’).

BACKGROUND

  1. The worker, Mr Barrett, injured his back whilst working for Central West Apprentices Ltd (‘Central West’) on 8 April 2003.  After a few months off work, during which time he received physiotherapy, his back settled and he returned to his original job.  He had no restrictions in the use or movement of his back and he continued his full pre-injury duties until 25 January 2005, when he suddenly developed severe pain in his low back and right leg whilst swinging an axe in the course of his employment.  He stopped work and…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Central West Group Apprentices Ltd v Barrett and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2008] NSWWCCPD 137
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Central West Group Apprentices Ltd appealed against an arbitrator's determination which awarded lump sum compensation to the respondent, a former employee, for injuries sustained to his lumbar spine in two separate incidents occurring in 2003 and 2005. The appellant argued that the injuries should not be considered together as they did not constitute a single injurious event, and that the respondent was therefore not entitled to compensation under section 67 of the Workers Compensation Act 1987. The appellant also challenged the arbitrator's decision to award compensation for pain and suffering. The court had to determine whether the two incidents could be aggregated to meet the threshold for compensation, and whether the respondent was entitled to compensation for pain and suffering. The court found that the two incidents were part of the same injurious process, and could therefore be aggregated under section 322 of the Workplace Injury Management and Workers Compensation Act 1998. The court also found that the respondent was entitled to compensation for pain and suffering. The appellant's appeal was dismissed and the respondent was awarded the compensation ordered by the arbitrator.

Orders

Orders of the court

Paragraphs one and two of the Arbitrator’s determination of 22 August 2008 are revoked and the following orders made:

“1.The Applicant sustained the same injury to his lumbar spine arising out of or in the course of his employment with the Respondent in incidents on 8 April 2003 and 25 January 2005. As a result, under section 322(2) of the Workplace Injury Management and Workers Compensation Act 1998, his impairments, assessed by an Approved Medical Specialist in a Medical Assessment Certificate dated 11 March 2008, are to be assessed together.

2. The Respondent is to pay the Applicant the following lump sum compensation:

(i) $15,000 under section 66 of the Workers Compensation Act 1987 in respect of a 12% whole person impairment made up as follows: 6% permanent impairment as a result of the incident on 8 April 2003 and 6% permanent impairment as a result of the incident on 25 January 2005;

(ii) $12,500 under section 67 of the Workers Compensation Act 1987 in respect of pain and suffering.

3. The orders made in paragraph 2 of the Certificate of Determination of 10 June 2008 and in paragraph 2(i) above will be satisfied on the payment of $15,000, if that has not already been paid.”

Paragraphs three and four of the Arbitrator’s determination of 22 August 2008 are confirmed.

The appellant employer is to pay the respondent worker’s costs of the appeal.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.