| [2015] FWCA 377 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Central Australian Aboriginal Congress Aboriginal Corporation
(AG2014/10352)
CENTRAL AUSTRALIAN ABORIGINAL CONGRESS ABORIGINAL CORPORATION (CAACAC) ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2014 -2017
Northern Territory | |
COMMISSIONER WILSON | MELBOURNE, 19 JANUARY 2015 |
Application for approval of the Central Australian Aboriginal Congress Aboriginal Corporation (CAACAC) Enterprise Agreement 2014-2017.
[1] An application has been made for approval of a single-enterprise agreement known as the Central Australian Aboriginal Congress Aboriginal Corporation (CAACAC) Enterprise Agreement 2014-2017 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by the Central Australian Aboriginal Congress Aboriginal Corporation.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act, as are relevant to this application for approval, have been met.
[3] The Australian Salaried Medical Officers’ Federation, United Voice, and the Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation (the Unions), being the bargaining representatives for the Agreement, have given notice under s.183 of the Act that they want the Agreement to cover them. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act I note that the Agreement covers the Unions.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 26 January 2015. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2017.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code J, AE412252 PR560101>
- AGLC
- Central Australian Aboriginal Congress Aboriginal Corporation [2015] FWCA 377
- Case
- [2015] FWCA 377
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues for the FWC were whether the agreement complied with the Fair Work Act 2009 and whether it met the criteria for being deemed fair and reasonable. This involved examining if the agreement was genuinely negotiated, if it provided for terms and conditions that were fair and reasonable, and if it was consistent with the statutory safety net. The FWC also had to consider the fairness of the process that led to the agreement, ensuring that the bargaining was conducted in good faith.
After reviewing the evidence and submissions from both parties, the FWC determined that the agreement was fair and reasonable. The FWC found that the agreement was genuinely negotiated and met the statutory standards. It concluded that the agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions, and it was consistent with the statutory safety net. The FWC approved the agreement, finding that it was in the best interests of the employees involved. The decision underscored the importance of ensuring that enterprise agreements are negotiated in good faith and provide for fair and reasonable terms.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.