| [2015] FWCA 1724 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Cement Australia Pty Limited
(AG2015/311)
CEMENT AUSTRALIA GLADSTONE UNION COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT 2014
Manufacturing and associated industries | |
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT DRAKE | SYDNEY, 13 MARCH 2015 |
Application for approval of the Cement Australia Gladstone Union Collective Agreement 2014.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Cement Australia Gladstone Union Collective Agreement 2014 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Cement Australia Pty Ltd. The agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] The Agreement was lodged within 14 days after it was made.
[3] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to the application for approval have been met.
[4] The Australian Workers’ Union, the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia, and the Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union, all being bargaining representatives for the Agreement, have given notice under s183 of the Act that they want the Agreement to cover them. In accordance with s201(2) of the Act I note that the Agreement covers those organisations.
[5] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s54 of the Act, will operate from 20 March 2015. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 April 2016.
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code J, AE413019 PR561941>
- AGLC
- Cement Australia Pty Limited [2015] FWCA 1724
- Case
- [2015] FWCA 1724
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Fair Work Commission found that the agreement contained provisions that were consistent with the principles of the Fair Work Act 2009. The Commission considered that the agreement provided for a fair and reasonable outcome for both parties and that it did not contain any terms that were detrimental to the employees. The Commission also considered that the agreement was not contrary to the public interest. The Commission found that the agreement was in accordance with the principles of the Act and that it did not contain any terms that were contrary to the public interest. The Commission approved the agreement and made it a lawful agreement.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.