| [2014] FWCA 5533 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Cement Australia Holdings Pty Ltd
(AG2014/1217)
CEMENT AUSTRALIA HOLDINGS PTY LTD RAILTON PLANT AND DEVONPORT TERMINAL OPERATIONS ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2014
Tasmania | |
COMMISSIONER LEE | MELBOURNE, 19 AUGUST 2014 |
Application for approval of the Cement Australia Holdings Pty Ltd Railton Plant and Devonport Terminal Operations Enterprise Agreement 2014.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Cement Australia Holdings Pty Ltd Railton Plant and Devonport Terminal Operations Enterprise Agreement 2014 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Cement Australia Holdings Pty Ltd. The agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] The Applicant has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.
[3] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[4] Pursuant to s.205(2) of the Act, the model consultation term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement and will be appended to the Agreement.
[5] The Australian Workers’ Union, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[6] The “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU), being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[7] The Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[8] The Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[9] The Agreement was approved on 19 August 2014 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 26 August 2014. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 1 April 2018.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code J, AE409598 PR554253>
ANNEXURE A
- AGLC
- Cement Australia Holdings Pty Ltd [2014] FWCA 5533
- Case
- [2014] FWCA 5533
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court considered the arguments presented by both parties and examined the provisions of the Fair Work Act 2009. The court found that the enterprise agreement met the requirements of the legislation and was in the best interests of the employees. The court noted that the agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment, including provisions for wages, hours of work, and other benefits. The court also noted that the agreement provided for a dispute resolution process and mechanisms for addressing issues that may arise during the operation of the agreement. The court found that the agreement was fair and reasonable and met the requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009.
The Fair Work Commission approved the Cement Australia Holdings Pty Ltd Railton Plant and Devonport Terminal Operations Enterprise Agreement 2014, finding that it met the requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009 and was in the best interests of the employees. The court found that the agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment and provided mechanisms for addressing any issues that may arise during the operation of the agreement. The court noted that the agreement was the result of good faith bargaining between the parties and reflected the needs of both employers and employees. The court concluded that the agreement was fair and reasonable and should be approved.
The Fair Work Commission approved the enterprise agreement, subject to certain conditions. The court found that the agreement met the requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009 and was in the best interests of the employees. The court noted that the agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment and provided mechanisms for addressing any issues that may arise during the operation of the agreement. The court found that the agreement was the result of good faith bargaining between the parties and reflected the needs of both employers and employees. The court concluded that the agreement was fair and reasonable and should be approved.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.