Cemcrete Pty Ltd

Case

[2013] FWC 6922

12 SEPTEMBER 2013

No judgment structure available for this case.

[2013] FWC 6922

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185 - Enterprise agreement

Cemcrete Pty Ltd
(AG2013/2381)

COMMISSIONER MACDONALD

SYDNEY, 12 SEPTEMBER 2013

Application for approval of the Cemcrete Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement - section 181(2) application dismissed.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Cemcrete Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Cemcrete Pty Ltd (the Employer). The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.

[2] Part 2-4 of the Act includes procedural requirements that must be satisfied before the Fair Work Commission (FWC) can approve of an enterprise agreement. One of these procedural requirements is specified by s.181 of the Act which states as follows:

    “181 Employers may request employees to approve a proposed enterprise agreement

      (1) An employer that will be covered by a proposed enterprise agreement may request the employees employed at the time who will be covered by the agreement to approve the agreement by voting for it.

      (2) The request must not be made until at least 21 days after the day on which the last notice under subsection 173(1) (which deals with giving notice of employee representational rights) in relation to the agreement is given.

      (3) Without limiting subsection (1), the employer may request that the employees vote by ballot or by an electronic method.”

[3] As can be seen from subsection 181 (2), a period of at least 21 days must elapse after the last Notice of Representational Rights is given, before any voting to approve an agreement is made. Thus, the date on which the last Notice of Representational Rights is given, is not a date included in the 21 days period criterion. The earliest date that voting can take place is on the 22nd day after the date that the last Notice of Representational Rights is given.

[4] The enterprise agreement application was accompanied by the Employer’s Declaration in Support of Application for Approval of Enterprise Agreement (Form F17 and Employer’s Declaration). Paragraph 2.8 of Form F17 advised that the date on which the last Notice of Representational Rights was given to an employee, who will be covered by the Agreement, was 8 July 2013. A copy of the Notice of Representational Rights was attached to the Employer’s Declaration.

[5] Paragraph 2.8 also advises that the date on which voting commenced was 29 July and the date on which the voting concluded was 1 August 2013. Thus, the lapse of time between the giving of the Notice of Representational Rights (8 July) and the first date to vote for the approval of the agreement (29 July) is only a lapse period of twenty days (having excluded 8 July and 29 July for counting purposes) and falls short of the 21 day lapse period required by s.181(2).

[6] My office wrote to the applicant on 30 August advising that the enterprise agreement application could not be approved because of the mandatory statutory requirement of a lapse of 21 days.

[7] The correspondence of 30 August out of my office also raised an issue with the enterprise agreement application, as to whether it would pass the Better Off Overall Test given the applicant’s response to paragraph 3.4 of Form F17.

[8] On the basis of paragraph 2.8 of the Employer’s Declaration, the voting for the enterprise agreement commenced earlier than that permitted by s.181 of the Act.

[9] By email of 11 September the applicant asked the FWC to “please withdraw the application”.

[10] I do not have the power to withdraw the application and accordingly I dismiss the application for approval of the Agreement.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code {A},  PR541723>

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0