Cedar Meats (Aust) Pty. Ltd. (Migration)

[2023] AATA 2869

Cedar Meats (Aust) Pty. Ltd. (Migration) [2023] AATA 2869 (11 August 2023)

DECISION RECORD

DIVISION:Migration & Refugee Division

APPLICANT:  Cedar Meats (Aust) Pty. Ltd.

REPRESENTATIVE:  Mr Tariq Ameer (MARN: 1807556)

CASE NUMBER:  2003571

HOME AFFAIRS REFERENCE(S):          BCC2019/3193966

MEMBER:Sheridan Aster

DATE:11 August 2023

PLACE OF DECISION:  Melbourne

DECISION:The Tribunal affirms the decision under review to refuse the nomination.

Statement made on 11 August 2023 at 3:13pm

CATCHWORDS 
MIGRATION – nomination – Temporary Residence Transition stream – applicant failed to provide the requested information within the prescribed period– not satisfied that the applicant is actively operating a business at this time – lack of available information and the lack of responses from the applicant– decision under review affirmed 

LEGISLATION
Migration Act 1958, ss 65, 245AR, 359, 360, 363
Migration Regulations 1994, r 5.19

CASES

Hasran v MIAC [2010] FCAFC 40

STATEMENT OF DECISION AND REASONS

APPLICATION FOR REVIEW

1. This is an application for review of a decision made by a delegate of the Minister for Home Affairs on 12 February 2020 to reject the applicant’s application for approval of the nomination of a position under reg 5.19 of the Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) (the Regulations).

2. The applicant applied for approval on 25 June 2019. The requirements for the approval of the nomination of a position in Australia are found in reg 5.19 of the Regulations, which contains general requirements for approval and additional requirements for approval set out in three alternative streams: a Temporary Residence Transition stream, a Direct Entry stream and a Labour Agreement stream. If the application meets the requirements for approval then the application must be approved: reg 5.19(3)(a). If any of the requirements are not met then the application must be refused: reg 5.19(3)(b).

3. In this case, the applicant has applied for approval of a nomination, seeking to satisfy the criteria in the Temporary Residence Transition stream.

4. On 13 July 2023, the Tribunal invited the applicant to provide current information addressing the relevant criteria under reg 5.19 of the Regulations. The invitation requested that the information be provided by 27 July 2023, noting that an extension of time to respond could be requested prior to that date. Finally, the Tribunal advised the applicant that if the information, or a request for an extension, was not received by the due date then the entitlement to appear before the Tribunal would be lost and the Tribunal might proceed to make its decision on the available evidence without taking any further steps to obtain the requested information.

5. The applicant did not provide the requested information within the prescribed period. In addition, the applicant did not request an extension of time and there has been no further communication from the applicant or its representative at the time of the Tribunal’s decision.

6. The Courts have confirmed that where an applicant fails to give information within the prescribed period in response to an invitation issued under s.359(2) of the Act, ss.360(3) and 363A of the Act preclude the Tribunal from offering the applicant a hearing.[1] Accordingly, as the applicant failed to give the information requested within the prescribed period, it has lost the right to appear before the Tribunal to give evidence and present arguments relating to the review application.

   [1] Hasran v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2010] FCAFC 40.

7. The Tribunal considered whether, in the circumstances of this case, the information that the applicant meets the requirements in the Regulations and the Act is likely to be forthcoming and whether the applicant has had a fair opportunity to provide the relevant information already, and the significance of the information to the applicant.

8. The Tribunal has had regard to the fact that the nomination application was refused by the Department on 12 February 2020. The applicant submitted a copy of the primary decision record with the review application. As a result, the Tribunal observes that the applicant has been aware of the reasons for the nomination application refusal for more than three years. Further, as noted above, the applicant has provided no further information to the Tribunal since the application for review was received, despite being invited to do so.

9. In these circumstances, the Tribunal considers that the applicant has had a fair opportunity to provide the relevant information and sufficient time to take steps to satisfy the regulatory criteria. The Tribunal notes that it is uncertain if and when the applicant will provide information in writing as to whether the nominating business meets the requirements in r.5.19. The Tribunal is not disposed to delay making a decision indefinitely.

10. For the following reasons, the Tribunal has decided to affirm the decision under review to refuse the nomination.

    CONSIDERATION OF CLAIMS AND EVIDENCE

11. The issue in this case is whether the applicant meets the general requirements for approval of the nomination set out in reg 5.19(4) and the stream specific requirements set out in reg 5.19(5), which are extracted in the attachment to this decision. For the nomination to be approved, all the requirements must be met.

    Status of the nominator – reg 5.19(5)(h)

12. Regulation 5.19(5)(h) requires that the nominator was the standard business sponsor who last identified the identified person in a nomination approved under s 140GB of the Act and is actively and lawfully operating a business in Australia.

13. The applicant applied to the Tribunal for merits review on 24 February 2020. A copy of the delegate’s decision was provided with the application for review. No new information has been provided to the Tribunal since that time. In the absence of any contemporaneous evidence, the Tribunal cannot be satisfied that the applicant is actively and lawfully operating a business in Australia at the date of this decision.

14. Given the above findings, the Tribunal is not satisfied that reg 5.19(5)(h) is met. Accordingly, reg 5.19(4)(e) is not met.

15. For these reasons the Tribunal is not satisfied that the applicant meets the requirements of reg 5.19. Accordingly, reg 5.19(3)(b) requires that the nomination must be refused. The decision under review must be affirmed.

    DECISION

16. The Tribunal affirms the decision under review to refuse the nomination.

    Sheridan Aster
    Member

    
    

    ATTACHMENT – EXTRACTS FROM THE MIGRATION REGULATIONS 1994

    5.19Approval of nominated positions—Subclass 186 (Employer Nomination Scheme) visa and Subclass 187 (Regional Sponsored Migration Scheme) visa

    Application

    (1)A person (the nominator) (including a partnership or unincorporated association) may apply to the Minister for approval of the nomination of a position in Australia.

    (2)The application must:

    (a)be made in accordance with approved form 1395 (Internet); and

    (b)identify the position; and

    (c)identify a person (the identified person) in relation to the position; and

    (d)identify an occupation in relation to the position; and

    (e)identify the subclass and stream to which the nomination relates, which must be one of the following:

    (i)a Subclass 186 (Employer Nomination Scheme) visa in the Temporary Residence Transition stream;

    (ii)a Subclass 187 (Regional Sponsored Migration Scheme) visa in the Temporary Residence Transition stream;

    (iii)a Subclass 186 (Employer Nomination Scheme) visa in the Direct Entry stream;

    (iv)Subclass 187 (Regional Sponsored Migration Scheme) visa in the Direct Entry stream;

    (v)a Subclass 186 (Employer Nomination Scheme) visa in the Labour Agreement stream; and

    (f)be accompanied by the fee mentioned in regulation 5.37; and

    (fa)be accompanied by any nomination training contribution charge the nominator is liable to pay in relation to the nomination; and

    (fb)identify the annual turnover (within the meaning of the Migration (Skilling Australians Fund) Charges Regulations 2018) for the nomination; and

    (g)include a written certification by the nominator stating whether or not the nominator has engaged in conduct, in relation to the nomination, that constitutes a contravention of subsection 245AR(1) of the Act.

    Approval of nomination

    (3)The Minister must, in writing:

    (a)approve the nomination if the Minister is satisfied that the requirements set out in subregulation (4) are met; or

    (b)otherwise—refuse to approve the nomination.

    Requirements for approval—general

    (4)The requirements to be met for the nomination to be approved are as follows:

    (a)the application is made in accordance with subregulation (2);

    (b)either:

    (i)there is no adverse information known to Immigration about the nominator or a person associated with the nominator; or

    (ii)it is reasonable to disregard any adverse information known to Immigration about the nominator or a person associated with the nominator;

    (c)if it is mandatory, in the State or Territory in which the position is located, for a person to:

    (i)hold a licence of a particular kind; or

    (ii)hold registration of a particular kind; or

    (iii)be a member (or a member of a particular kind) of a particular professional body;

    to perform tasks of the kind to be performed in the occupation, the identified person is, or is eligible to become, the holder of the licence, the holder of the registration, or a member of the body, at the time of application;

    (d)the nominator has a satisfactory record of compliance with the laws of the Commonwealth, and of each State or Territory in which the nominator operates a business and employs employees in the business, relating to employment;

    (da)any debt due by the nominator as mentioned in section 140ZO of the Act (recovery of nomination training contribution charge and late payment penalty) has been paid in full;

    (e)if the nomination relates to a visa in a Temporary Residence Transition stream—the requirements set out in subregulation (5) are met;

    (f)if the nomination relates to a visa in a Direct Entry stream—the requirements set out in subregulation (9) are met;

    (g)if the nomination relates to a visa in a Labour Agreement stream—the requirements set out in subregulation (14) are met.

    Temporary Residence Transition stream—additional requirements for approval

    (5)If the nomination relates to a visa in a Temporary Residence Transition stream, the following requirements must also be met:

    (a)at the time the application is made, the identified person holds:

    (i)a Subclass 457 (Temporary Work (Skilled)) visa granted on the basis that the person satisfied the criterion in subclause 457.223(4) of Schedule 2 as in force before 18 March 2018; or

    (ii)a Subclass 482 (Temporary Skill Shortage) visa in the Medium‑term stream; or

    (iii)for a person specified in a legislative instrument made by the Minister for the purposes of this subparagraph—a Subclass 482 (Temporary Skill Shortage) visa in the Short‑term stream; or

    (iv)if the last substantive visa held by the identified person was a visa mentioned in subparagraph (i), (ii) or (iii)—a bridging visa granted on the basis that the person is an applicant for a visa mentioned in subparagraph (i) or (ii); or

    (v)if the last substantive visa held by the identified person was a visa mentioned in subparagraph (i), (ii) or (iii)—for a person specified in a legislative instrument made under subparagraph (iii), a bridging visa granted on the basis that the person is an applicant for a visa mentioned in subparagraph (iii); or

    (vi)if the last substantive visa held by the identified person was a visa mentioned in subparagraph (i), (ii) or (iii)—a bridging visa granted on the basis that the person is an applicant for a Subclass 186 (Employer Nomination Scheme) visa or a Subclass 187 (Regional Sponsored Migration Scheme) visa;

    (b)the occupation:

    (i)is listed in ANZSCO; and

    (ii)has the same 4‑digit ANZSCO occupation unit group code as the occupation in relation to which the identified person’s most recently held Subclass 457 (Temporary Work (Skilled)) visa or Subclass 482 (Temporary Skill Shortage) visa was granted;

    (c)unless a legislative instrument made under subregulation (8) exempts the identified person from the operation of this paragraph—the occupation must:

    (i)be an occupation specified in an instrument made under subregulation (8) and in force at the time the application is made; and

    (ii)apply to the identified person in accordance with an instrument made under that subregulation;

    (d)either:

    (i)there is no information known to Immigration that indicates that the identified person is not genuinely performing the tasks of the occupation as specified in ANZSCO; or

    (ii)it is reasonable to disregard any such information;

    (e)during the period of 4 years immediately before the application is made, the identified person held one or more of the following for a total period of at least 3 years:

    (i)a Subclass 457 (Temporary Work (Skilled)) visa granted on the basis that the person satisfied the criterion in subclause 457.223(4) of Schedule 2 as in force before 18 March 2018;

    (ii)a Subclass 482 (Temporary Skill Shortage) visa in the Medium‑term stream;

    (iii)for a person specified in a legislative instrument made under subparagraph (a)(iii)—a Subclass 482 (Temporary Skill Shortage) visa in the Short‑term stream;

    (f)unless paragraph (g) applies—during the period of 4 years immediately before the application is made, the identified person was employed in the position in relation to which the visa, or visas, mentioned in paragraph (e) were granted:

    (i)for a total period of at least 3 years (not including any periods of unpaid leave); and

    (ii)on a full‑time basis, with the employment being undertaken in Australia;

    (g)if the visa, or visas, mentioned in paragraph (e) were granted in relation to an occupation specified in an instrument made under subregulation 2.72(13)—during the period of 4 years immediately before the application is made, the identified person was employed in the occupation for a total period of at least 3 years (not including any periods of unpaid leave);

    (h)the nominator:

    (i)was the standard business sponsor who last identified the identified person in a nomination approved under section 140GB of the Act; and

    (ii)is actively and lawfully operating a business in Australia;

    (j)the application identifies a need for the identified person to be employed in the position, under the direct control of the nominator;

    (k)there is a genuine need for the identified person to be employed in the position, under the direct control of the nominator;

    (l)the identified person will be employed on a full‑time basis in the position for at least 2 years;

    (m)the terms and conditions of the identified person’s employment will not include an express exclusion of the possibility of extending the period of employment;

    (n)the nominator’s business has the capacity to employ the identified person for at least 2 years and to pay the person at least the annual market salary rate for the occupation each year;

    (o)the requirements set out in subregulation 2.72(15) are met, applying subregulations 2.72(15) and (16) as if:

    (i)paragraph 2.72(15)(a) did not apply; and

    (ii)references to the nominee were references to the identified person; and

    (iii)references to the person were references to the nominator;

    (p)either:

    (i)there is no information known to Immigration that indicates that the employment conditions (other than in relation to earnings) that will apply to the identified person are less favourable than those that apply, or would apply, to an Australian citizen or an Australian permanent resident performing equivalent work at the same location; or

    (ii)it is reasonable to disregard any such information;

    (q)the nominator has provided the information required by the Minister for the purposes of paragraph (k) to (n).

    Minister may vary certain Temporary Residence Transition stream requirements

    (6)The Minister may, by legislative instrument, determine different periods of time for the purposes of paragraphs (5)(e), (f) and (g) for persons specified in the instrument.

    (7)Paragraphs (5)(j), (k) and (l) do not apply in relation to occupations specified in an instrument made under subregulation 2.72(13).

    (8)The Minister may, by legislative instrument, specify:

    (a)occupations for the purposes of paragraph (5)(c); and

    (b)persons who are exempt from the operation of that paragraph; and

    (c)for each occupation, any matters for the purposes of determining whether the occupation applies to an identified person, including matters relating to any of the following:

    (i)the nominator;

    (ii)the identified person;

    (iii)the occupation;

    (iv)the position in which the identified person is to work;

    (v)the circumstances in which the occupation is undertaken;

    (vi)the circumstances in which the person is to be employed in the position.