CAVE & LEVIS

Case [2017] FCCA 2647


FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA

CAVE & LEVIS [2017] FCCA 2647
Catchwords:
FAMILY LAW – Parenting – interim application – appropriate approach to application for ex parte recovery orders – approach on return date after ex parte recovery order – discharge of ex parte orders.

Legislation:

Family Law Act 1975, ss.11F, 60CC, 65

Family Law Rules 2004, rr.5.12, 5.13

Cases cited:

Scarle & Ringwood and Anor [2017] FamCAFC 57
Sawant & Karanth [2014] FamCAFC 235
National Australia Bank v Bond Brewing Holdings Ltd [1991] VicRp 31; [1991] 1 VR 386
Dalglish v Jarvie [1850] EngR 688; 42 ER 89; (1850) 2 Mac & G 231
Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd v Allam [2016] HCA 3
Thomas Edison Limited v. Bullock [1972] HCA 72; (1912) 15 C.L.R. 67
Myrtle & Myrtle [2012] FamCA 460
Stowe and Stowe [1980] FamCA 92; (1981) FLC 91-027; (1980) 6 FamLR 757
In the Marriage of Erdal [1992] FamCA 22
Besser & McCoy [2008] FamCAFC 27

Goode & Goode [2006] FamCA 1346

Applicant: MS CAVE
Respondent: MR LEVIS
File Number: MLC 9117 of 2017
Judgment of: Judge Riethmuller
Hearing date: 9 October 2017
Date of Last Submission: 9 October 2017
Delivered at: Melbourne
Delivered on: 9 October 2017

REPRESENTATION

Counsel for the Applicant: Mr A Lovering
Solicitors for the Applicant: Ballarat Lawyers
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr Pavone
Solicitors for the Respondent: Nevett Ford

ORDERS

  1. Order 4 of the Orders made by the Magistrates’ Court at Ballarat on 30 August 2017 be varied to injunct both parties from taking or sending or attempting to take or send the children X born (omitted) 2011 and Y born (omitted) 2014 from the Commonwealth of Australia.

  2. The children live with the Respondent.

  3. The children spend time and communicate with the Applicant as follows:

    (a)By telephone/Facetime every day subject to 3(b) hereof between 5:00pm and 5:30pm (Queensland time) with the Applicant to call the Respondent and the Respondent ensure his phone is switched on and charged.

    (b)By Skype each Monday, Wednesday and Saturday between 5:00pm and 5:30pm.

    (c)Should the Applicant be able to travel to Brisbane and upon giving the Respondent 48 hours written notice, she spend time with the children from 5:00pm Friday until 5:00pm Sunday.

    (d)Such other times as agreed between the parties.

  4. In the event that the matter is unable to be listed before the Queensland long summer vacation in 2017/2018 then it is agreed that the children spend half of such holidays with the Applicant at such time and date as agreed.

  5. Pursuant to rule 21.15 of the Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001, the Court certifies that it was reasonable for the parties to employ an advocate.

THE COURT DIRECTS THAT:

  1. The matter be transferred to the BRISBANE sittings of the Federal Circuit Court on 31 October 2017 at 9:30am before Judge Jarett for mention.

AND THE COURT NOTES THAT:

A.Orders 4, 5 and 6 of the Orders of the Magistrates’ Court at Ballarat on 30 August 2017 remain in…

Continue reading CAVE & LEVIS

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
CAVE & LEVIS [2017] FCCA 2647
Case
[2017] FCCA 2647
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the matter of *Cave & Levis*, heard by Judge Riethmuller, the dispute concerned parenting arrangements for two children, X and Y. The proceedings involved an application for, and subsequent return of, ex parte recovery orders, and the discharge of those orders.

The court was required to determine the appropriate approach to applications for ex parte recovery orders and the subsequent proceedings on the return date, particularly in relation to the discharge of such orders. The court also had to consider the interim parenting arrangements for the children.

The court varied an existing order to injunct both parties from taking or sending the children from Australia. It ordered that the children live with the Respondent and set out specific arrangements for the children to spend time and communicate with the Applicant, including daily telephone/Facetime contact, Skype sessions, and supervised time if the Applicant could travel to Brisbane. The court also made provision for holiday time and directed the transfer of the matter to the Brisbane sittings of the Federal Circuit Court. Existing orders from the Magistrates’ Court at Ballarat were noted to remain in full force and effect, and the court certified that it was reasonable for the parties to employ an advocate.

Orders

Orders of the court

1.

Order 4 of the Orders made by the Magistrates’ Court at Ballarat on 30 August 2017 be varied to injunct both parties from taking or sending or attempting to take or send the children X born (omitted) 2011 and Y born (omitted) 2014 from the Commonwealth of Australia.

2.

The children live with the Respondent.

3.

The children spend time and communicate with the Applicant as follows:

(a) By telephone/Facetime every day subject to 3(b) hereof between 5:00pm and 5:30pm (Queensland time) with the Applicant to call the Respondent and the Respondent ensure his phone is switched on and charged.

(b) By Skype each Monday, Wednesday and Saturday between 5:00pm and 5:30pm.

(c) Should the Applicant be able to travel to Brisbane and upon giving the Respondent 48 hours written notice, she spend time with the children from 5:00pm Friday until 5:00pm Sunday.

(d) Such other times as agreed between the parties.

4.

In the event that the matter is unable to be listed before the Queensland long summer vacation in 2017/2018 then it is agreed that the children spend half of such holidays with the Applicant at such time and date as agreed.

5.

Pursuant to rule 21.15 of the Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001, the Court certifies that it was reasonable for the parties to employ an advocate.

THE COURT DIRECTS THAT:

6.

The matter be transferred to the BRISBANE sittings of the Federal Circuit Court on 31 October 2017 at 9:30am before Judge Jarett for mention.

AND THE COURT NOTES THAT:

A. Orders 4, 5 and 6 of the Orders of the Magistrates’ Court at Ballarat on 30 August 2017 remain in full force and effect.

B. Pursuant to ss.65DA(2) and 62B of the Family Law Act 1975 the particulars of the obligations these orders create and the particulars of the consequences that may follow if a person contravenes these orders are set out in Annexure A and these particulars are included in these orders.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.