Administrative
Appeals
Tribunal
DECISION AND REASONS FOR DECISION [2004] AATA 1006
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL )
) No A2003/124
GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE DIVISION ) Re ROSS CATANZARITI Applicant
And
COMCARE
Respondent
DECISION
Tribunal Mr J.W. Constance, Senior Member
Dr M.D. Miller AO, MemberDate24 September 2004
PlaceCanberra
Decision The decision of the respondent made on 21 March 2004 is affirmed. ..............................................
Senior Member
CATCHWORDS
COMPENSATION – whether ectopic heartbeat an “ailment” – whether employment materially contributed to ectopic heartbeat – whether employment materially contributed to underlying condition of atrial fibrillation – whether ectopic heartbeat and hypertension caused by accepted injury of aggravation of a pre-existing chronic anxiety state – decision affirmed
Safety Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1998 (Cth) – s4
Comcare v Mooi (1996) 137 ALR 690
Casarotto v Australia Postal Commission (1989) 86 ALR 399
REASONS FOR DECISION
24 September 2004 Mr J.W. Constance, Senior Member Dr M.D. Miller, Member 1. On 18 November 1983, Comcare determined that Mr Catanzariti had suffered an aggravation of a pre-existing chronic anxiety state to which his employment by the Australian Government Publishing Service was a contributing factor. On 20 May 2002 Mr Catanzariti requested an extension of the accepted condition to include heart palpitations and hypertension.
2. By decision of 21 March 2003 Comcare denied liability for these conditions. Mr Catanzariti has applied to the Tribunal to review this decision.
3. The Tribunal has decided to affirm Comcare's decision of 21 March 2003.
FINDINGS OF FACT:
4. In the following paragraphs, we set out our findings of material questions of fact and the evidence or other material on which those findings are based. Where the findings are based on a document before the Tribunal, we note that document.
5. Mr Catanzariti is 58 years old. He commenced work as a bookbinder with the Australian Government Publishing Service on 29 April 1974 (documents T1, T2 and T12).
6. On 5 July 1983, Mr Catanzariti reported to his employer that he suffered from an anxiety state, which was brought about by many incidents at work over a period of approximately nine and a half years (T5). On 18 November 1983, it was determined that Mr Catanzariti had contracted a disease, namely aggravation of a pre-existing chronic anxiety state, to which his employment was a contributing factor (T15).
7. Mr Catanzariti continues to suffer long term anxiety, contributed to by his employment, and the probability is that this situation will continue (report of Dr Knox 5/6/03,exhibit A3).
8. Mr Catanzariti suffered four episodes of atrial fibrillation between 1978 and 1996. There was no physical cause identified for the first episode. There were further incidents of atrial fibrillation in 1981 and 1982, both of which occurred after Mr Catanzariti consumed some alcohol. The last episode of atrial fibrillation occurred in 1996. Mr Catanzariti gave evidence of these incidents and they were confirmed by the evidence of Mr Catanzariti's cardiologist, Dr Peak, and cardiologist, Dr French, who examined Mr Catanzariti on behalf of Comcare.
9. Mr Catanzariti…
Continue reading Catanzariti and Comcare
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Catanzariti and Comcare [2004] AATA 1006
- Case
- [2004] AATA 1006
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court required a meticulous examination of the legislative provisions and the relevant case law to determine the scope of compensable conditions. The court had to discern whether Mr Catanzariti's ectopic heartbeats and hypertension were ailments that fell within the ambit of the Act. Additionally, the court needed to assess whether his employment materially contributed to these conditions and if they were caused by the aggravation of a pre-existing chronic anxiety state due to an accepted injury. The court referenced Comcare v Mooi and Casarotto v Australia Postal Commission to frame its analysis within the established legal precedent.
The Federal Court affirmed the respondent’s decision, concluding that the ectopic heartbeats and hypertension did not qualify as ailments under the Act. The court found that Mr Catanzariti's employment did not materially contribute to his ectopic heartbeats or hypertension. Furthermore, it was determined that these conditions were not caused by an aggravation of a pre-existing chronic anxiety state due to an accepted injury. The court's reasoning was grounded in the legislative definition of “ailment” and the applicable case law, which required a direct connection between the employment and the condition in question. Consequently, the decision of the respondent was upheld.
Orders
Orders of the court
The decision of the respondent made on 21 March 2004 is affirmed.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.