| [2016] FWCA 7271 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.222—Enterprise agreement
Catalpa Management Resources Pty Ltd
(AG2016/6256)
CATALPA MANAGEMENT RESOURCES NSW ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2015
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
COMMISSIONER WILLIAMS | PERTH, 12 OCTOBER 2016 |
Application of the termination of the Catalpa Management Resources NSW Enterprise Agreement 2015.
[1] On 7 October 2016 Catalpa Management Resources Pty Ltd (the Employer) filed an application pursuant to s.222 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act)to terminate the Catalpa Management Resources NSW Enterprise Agreement 2015 (the Agreement).
[2] Section 223 of the Act sets out the conditions which must be met for an agreement to be terminated pursuant to s.222 of the Act:
“223 When the FWC must approve a termination of an enterprise agreement
If an application for the approval of a termination of an enterprise agreement is made under section 222, the FWC must approve the termination if:
(a) the FWC is satisfied that each employer covered by the agreement complied with subsection 220(2) (which deals with giving employees a reasonable opportunity to decide etc.) in relation to the agreement; and
(b) the FWC is satisfied that the termination was agreed to in accordance with whichever of subsection 221(1) or (2) applies (those subsections deal with agreement to the termination of different kinds of enterprise agreements by employee vote); and
(c) the FWC is satisfied that there are no other reasonable grounds for believing that the employees have not agreed to the termination; and
(d) the FWC considers that it is appropriate to approve the termination taking into account the views of the employee organisation or employee organisations (if any) covered by the agreement.”
[3] Based on the material that is before me, including the Statutory Declaration sworn by Mr Barry O’Neill the Director of the Employer, I am satisfied that the requirements of s.223 of the Act have been met.
[4] In accordance with s.224 of the Act, the termination will come into effect on the date of this decision.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code A, AE416575 PR586290>
- AGLC
- Catalpa Management Resources Pty Ltd [2016] FWCA 7271
- Case
- [2016] FWCA 7271
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the Commission was whether the company had met the necessary criteria and followed the appropriate procedures for terminating the enterprise agreement. The company argued that the agreement was no longer appropriate due to significant changes in the business environment and workforce composition, necessitating a revision of terms. The Commission had to determine if the changes presented were substantial enough to warrant the termination of the existing agreement and whether the correct procedural steps were followed.
The Commission considered the changes proposed and the procedural compliance by the company. It assessed whether the termination was in good faith and whether the company had followed the necessary consultation and negotiation processes as stipulated by the Fair Work Act 2009. After reviewing the evidence and arguments, the Commission found that the company had not sufficiently demonstrated the necessity for terminating the agreement nor adhered to the required procedures. Therefore, the application to terminate the enterprise agreement was dismissed.
The Fair Work Commission ordered that the Catalpa Management Resources NSW Enterprise Agreement 2015 remain in effect, and no further applications for termination could be made without addressing the procedural deficiencies identified by the Commission. The company was also directed to continue engaging in good-faith negotiations with the relevant employee representatives.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.