CASEY & CASEY

Link copied
Case Copied 25 min read

FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA

CASEY & CASEY [2016] FCCA 1998
Catchwords:
FAMILY LAW – Property dispute – around 20 years cohabitation – husband made greater initial contribution – wife has greater needs – wife’s poor health – husband has greater income earning capacity – wife unlikely to earn a significant income, unlike the husband – wife has overwhelming needs.

Legislation:

Family Law Act 1975(Cth), ss.75(2), 79

Cases cited:

Stanford v Stanford (2012) 87 ALJR 74

Jewel v Jewel [2013] FCWA 81

Applicant: MS CASEY
Respondent: MR CASEY
File Number: MLC 1756 of 2015
Judgment of: Judge Curtain
Hearing dates: 30 and 31 May 2016
Date of Last Submission: 31 May 2016
Delivered at: Melbourne
Delivered on: 15 August 2016

ORDERS

  1. The net proceeds from the sale of the former matrimonial home of $327,052 plus interest, less the interim payment of $90,000 to the parties, leaving $237,052 plus interest be distributed as follows:

    (a)60% to the wife plus $2,750 from the husband’s share for unpaid costs; and

    (b)40% to the husband less $2,750 to be paid to the wife for the outstanding costs.

  2. The husband have the sole title and interest in the Mazda and Daihatsu motor vehicles and all tools currently in his possession.

  3. The wife have the sole title and interest in the Suzuki motor vehicle currently in her possession.

  4. The wife have the sole right and title in the chattels including all photographs in her possession or control, save for:

    (a)Z’s television;

    (b)The bar refrigerator;

    (c)2 televisions not required by the wife;

    (d)The outdoor timber setting;

    (e)The “daughter’s” desk;

    (f)The beach wind break; and

    (g)The table and chairs

    currently located in storage, under the control of the wife, to be collected by the husband’s agent (in the absence of the husband) on a day and time agreed to by the parties.

  5. The wife shall at her earliest convenience attend a business that creates copy photographs and shall:

    (a)obtain a written quote for reproduction of family photographs in her possession;

    (b)forward the quote to the husband who shall pay same within 21 days of receipt if he wishes to have the copy photographs and advise the wife accordingly; and

    (c)the wife shall then obtain the copy reproductions and forward them to the husband.

  6. The husband is hereby restrained from obtaining, removing or possessing any original family photographs that are currently in the possession of the wife and are her property pursuant to these orders.

  7. That unless otherwise specified in these orders and save for the purposes of enforcing any monies due under these or any subsequent orders:

    (a)Each party be solely entitled to the exclusion of the other to all other property (including choses-in-action) in the possession of such party as at the date of these orders;

    (b)Each party be solely liable for and indemnify the other against any liability encumbering any item of property to which that party is entitled pursuant to these orders; and

    (c)Any joint tenancy of the parties in any real or personal…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read CASEY & CASEY and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2016] FCCA 1998
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the matter of *Casey & Casey*, Curtain J determined the division of property between a husband and wife following their separation. The dispute concerned the distribution of the net proceeds from the sale of the former matrimonial home, various motor vehicles, chattels, and original family photographs.

The court was required to determine how the net proceeds of the matrimonial home sale should be divided, considering an interim payment already made. Further issues included the allocation of title to specific motor vehicles, the division of household chattels, and the disposition of original family photographs, including the provision for the husband to obtain copies. The court also addressed the entitlement to other property in the possession of each party and the severance of any joint tenancies.

Curtain J ordered that the net proceeds from the sale of the former matrimonial home, after deducting an interim payment, be distributed with 60% to the wife and 40% to the husband. The husband was also ordered to pay $2,750 from his share to the wife for outstanding costs. The husband was granted sole title to the Mazda and Daihatsu vehicles and all tools in his possession, while the wife received sole title to the Suzuki vehicle and most chattels in her possession. Specific items located in storage were to be collected by the husband's agent. The wife was directed to obtain a quote for copying family photographs, which the husband would pay for if he wished to receive them. The husband was restrained from taking any original family photographs from the wife. Finally, each party was declared solely entitled to other property in their possession, solely liable for associated liabilities, and all joint tenancies were severed.

Orders

Orders of the court

1.

The net proceeds from the sale of the former matrimonial home of $327,052 plus interest, less the interim payment of $90,000 to the parties, leaving $237,052 plus interest be distributed as follows:

(a) 60% to the wife plus $2,750 from the husband’s share for unpaid costs; and

(b) 40% to the husband less $2,750 to be paid to the wife for the outstanding costs.

2.

The husband have the sole title and interest in the Mazda and Daihatsu motor vehicles and all tools currently in his possession.

3.

The wife have the sole title and interest in the Suzuki motor vehicle currently in her possession.

4.

The wife have the sole right and title in the chattels including all photographs in her possession or control, save for:

(a)Z’s television;

(b) The bar refrigerator;

(c) 2 televisions not required by the wife;

(d) The outdoor timber setting;

(e) The “daughter’s” desk;

(f) The beach wind break; and

(g) The table and chairs

currently located in storage, under the control of the wife, to be collected by the husband’s agent (in the absence of the husband) on a day and time agreed to by the parties.

5.

The wife shall at her earliest convenience attend a business that creates copy photographs and shall:

(a) obtain a written quote for reproduction of family photographs in her possession;

(b) forward the quote to the husband who shall pay same within 21 days of receipt if he wishes to have the copy photographs and advise the wife accordingly; and

(c) the wife shall then obtain the copy reproductions and forward them to the husband.

6.

The husband is hereby restrained from obtaining, removing or possessing any original family photographs that are currently in the possession of the wife and are her property pursuant to these orders.

7.

That unless otherwise specified in these orders and save for the purposes of enforcing any monies due under these or any subsequent orders:

(a) Each party be solely entitled to the exclusion of the other to all other property (including choses-in-action) in the possession of such party as at the date of these orders;

(b) Each party be solely liable for and indemnify the other against any liability encumbering any item of property to which that party is entitled pursuant to these orders; and

(c) Any joint tenancy of the parties in any real or personal estate is hereby expressly severed.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.