CASA Ex35/06 – Exemption – of authorised flying instructors employed by Singapore Flying College Pte Ltd (Cth)

Case
No judgment structure available for this case.

Instrument number CASA EX35/06

I, bruce ROBERT gemmell, Deputy Chief Executive and Chief Operating Officer, a delegate of CASA, make this instrument under regulation 308 the Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 (CAR 1988).

[Signed B. Gemmell]

Bruce Gemmell
Deputy Chief Executive and
   Chief Operating Officer

28 July 2006

Exemption — of authorised flying instructors employed by Singapore Flying College Pte Ltd

1          Duration

            This instrument:

(a)   commences on 1 August 2006; and

(b)   stops having effect at the end of July 2008.

2          Application

            This instrument applies to flying training conducted by an authorised flying instructor employed by Singapore Flying College Pte Ltd (Aviation Reference Number W901286) (the College).

3          Exemption

The College is exempt from compliance with paragraph 5.70 (a) of CAR 1988.

4          Conditions

            The exemption is subject to the conditions mentioned in Schedule 1.

Schedule 1          Conditions

            The flying instructor must ensure that the flying training is conducted:

(a)   only in Cessna 172 or Beechcraft 58 type aircraft;  and

(b)   only in relation to student pilots of the College who:

             (i)  have at least 20 hours aeronautical experience in a registered or a recognised aeroplane of which 5 hours are as pilot in command and at least 2 hours are instrument flight time; and

            (ii)  have completed a flight test (for the category of aircraft that the student proposes to fly) that is:

(A)    based on a syllabus of flying training that is nominated by the College and approved in writing by CASA as equivalent to the general flying progress flight test; and

(B)    conducted by an approved testing officer or CASA; and

(c)   only for the purposes of the flying instructor’s employment by the College.

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0