Carter and De Nada
Case
•
[2010] FamCA 309
•16 April 2010
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Carter and De Nada [2010] FamCA 309
[2010] FamCA 309
16 April 2010
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the matter of *Carter and De Nada*, heard before Cohen J, the applicant sought orders declaring the marriage between the parties void. The respondent did not appear before the court.
The central legal issue before the court was whether the marriage between the applicant and the respondent, solemnised in February 1995, was void. Specifically, the court was required to determine if the respondent was lawfully married to another person at the time of the ceremony.
Cohen J found that the marriage was void on the ground that the respondent was already lawfully married to another person at the time of the marriage to the applicant. The court applied the principle that a marriage is void where one of the parties is already married, rendering the subsequent union invalid from its inception.
Consequently, Cohen J ordered that the marriage between the parties was void on the stated ground.
The central legal issue before the court was whether the marriage between the applicant and the respondent, solemnised in February 1995, was void. Specifically, the court was required to determine if the respondent was lawfully married to another person at the time of the ceremony.
Cohen J found that the marriage was void on the ground that the respondent was already lawfully married to another person at the time of the marriage to the applicant. The court applied the principle that a marriage is void where one of the parties is already married, rendering the subsequent union invalid from its inception.
Consequently, Cohen J ordered that the marriage between the parties was void on the stated ground.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
-
Statutory Interpretation
Legal Concepts
-
Jurisdiction
-
Statutory Construction
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Carter and De Nada [2010] FamCA 309
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
0
Statutory Material Cited
0