Carter and De Nada
[2010] FamCA 309
•16 April 2010
FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| CARTER & DE NADA | [2010] FamCA 309 |
| FAMILY LAW – MARRIAGE – Nullity |
| APPLICANT: | Ms Carter |
| RESPONDENT: | Mr De Nada |
| FILE NUMBER: | SYC | 1798 | of | 2010 |
| DATE DELIVERED: | 16 April 2010 |
| PLACE DELIVERED: | Sydney |
| PLACE HEARD: | Sydney |
| JUDGMENT OF: | Cohen J |
| HEARING DATE: | 16 April 2010 |
REPRESENTATION
| SOLICITOR FOR THE APPLICANT: | Mr Ryrie, ELLIOT TUTHILL SOLICITORS |
Orders
That the marriage between the parties which took place on … February 1995 is void on the ground that at the time of that marriage the respondent was lawfully married to some other person.
Notation:
A.That there is no appearance by the respondent.
IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment under the pseudonym Carter & De Nada is approved pursuant to s 121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth)
| FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT SYDNEY |
FILE NUMBER: SYC 1798 of 2010
| MS CARTER |
Applicant
And
| MR DE NADA |
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
I note that there is no appearance by the respondent. This is an application to declare a marriage between the parties void. The parties purportedly, or actually, married on … February 1995 in circumstances where the respondent had married another person on 5 November 1987 and was not divorced by the time of the marriage on … February. In fact, he was divorced on 30 November 2001. Further, he pleaded guilty and was convicted of bigamy on 5 December 2006. In those circumstances, section 23B(1)(a) of the Marriage Act applies to make the marriage to the applicant void. I shall make the order which is sought.
I certify that the preceding one (1) paragraph is a true copy of the reasons for judgment of the Honourable Justice Cohen.
Associate:
Date: 23 April 2010
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
-
Statutory Interpretation
Legal Concepts
-
Jurisdiction
-
Statutory Construction
0
0
0