Carter and Carter and Anor

Link copied
Case Copied 12 min read

FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA

CARTER & CARTER & ANOR [2017] FamCA 373
FAMILY LAW – PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – where the applicant seeks to view his parents Family Court file – where the applicant seeks to proceed on an undefended basis – leave granted to proceed on an undefended basis - where the applicant be permitted to inspect the consent orders made in the proceedings concerning his parents – where the applicant is not permitted to search the entire court file

Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) s 121
Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth) rr 24.13(1)(c), 24.13(3)

APPLICANT: Mr A Carter
1st RESPONDENT: Mr B Carter
2nd RESPONDENT: Ms C Carter
FILE NUMBER: MLF 27378 of 1977
DATE DELIVERED: 31 May 2017
PLACE DELIVERED: Melbourne
PLACE HEARD: Melbourne
JUDGMENT OF: Johns J
HEARING DATE: 3 May 2017

REPRESENTATION

THE APPLICANT: In Person
FIRST RESPONDENT: No Appearance
SECOND RESPONDENT: No Appearance

Orders

1.That the applicant be permitted to inspect the orders made on 22 November 1977 in proceedings numbered MLF 27378 of 1977.

2.That the applicant’s Application in a Case filed 9 February 2017 be otherwise dismissed.

IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment by this Court under the pseudonym Carter & Carter and Anor has been approved by the Chief Justice pursuant to s 121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).

FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT MELBOURNE

FILE NUMBER: MLF 27378  of 1977

Mr A Carter

Applicant

And

Mr B Carter and Ms C Carter

Respondent

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

INTRODUCTION

  1. By Application in a Case filed 9 February 2017, the applicant, Mr A Carter seeks orders in the following terms:-

    1.Order permitting me access to my parents’ Family Court file.

    2.Copies of any orders in the matter pertaining to myself, ie: containing my name, regardless of whether they are consent orders or decided by the Court.

  2. That application was made following the refusal by a Registrar of the applicant’s request to inspect the Court file.  Registrar Field responded to that request by letter dated 19 January 2017 in which she stated as follows:-

    I have been referred your letters of 30 December 2016 and 11 January 2017 in which you have requested to inspect your parents’ Family Court file so that you can better understand why the Court made the decisions it did in relation to the parenting arrangements for you and your siblings.

    I have ascertained that the Court played no role in determining the parenting arrangements apart from making consent orders in accordance with an agreement reached by your parents shortly after proceedings were commenced.  No reports were prepared and no reasons are available as the orders were made by consent.

    Without the consent of your parents to provide you with access to their file, noting that it largely relates to financial issues that were also resolved by consent, I am unable to support your request. 

    …

  3. The matter was first listed before me in a Judicial Duty List on 4 April 2017.  The applicant appeared in…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Carter and Carter and Anor and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2017] FamCA 373
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In *Carter and Carter and Anor*, the applicant sought access to his parents' Family Court file and leave to proceed on an undefended basis. The proceedings concerned the applicant's request to view his parents' Family Court file, specifically consent orders made in earlier proceedings.

The central legal issues before Johns J were whether the applicant should be permitted to inspect the consent orders made in the proceedings concerning his parents, and whether he should be permitted to search the entire court file. The court was also required to determine whether to grant leave for the applicant to proceed on an undefended basis.

Johns J granted the applicant leave to proceed on an undefended basis. His Honour permitted the applicant to inspect the consent orders made on 22 November 1977 in proceedings numbered MLF 27378 of 1977, but otherwise dismissed the applicant's Application in a Case filed on 9 February 2017, thereby refusing access to the entire court file.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. That the applicant be permitted to inspect the orders made on 22 November 1977 in proceedings numbered MLF 27378 of 1977.

2. That the applicant’s Application in a Case filed 9 February 2017 be otherwise dismissed.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.