Carrick Hill Trust v Andrew Garrett Vineyard Estates Pty Ltd

FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Carrick Hill Trust v Andrew Garrett Vineyard Estates Pty Ltd [1999] FCA 1521
CARRICK HILL TRUST v ANDREW GARRETT VINEYARD ESTATES
PTY LIMITED (ACN 076 150 260)
S 63 OF 1999
MANSFIELD J
19 OCTOBER 1999
DARWIN (via video link-up to Adelaide)

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY

S 63 OF 1999

BETWEEN:

CARRICK HILL TRUST
APPLICANT

AND:

ANDREW GARRETT VINEYARD ESTATES
PTY LIMITED (ACN 076 150 260)
RESPONDENT

JUDGE:

MANSFIELD J

DATE:

19 OCTOBER 1999

PLACE:

DARWIN (via video link-up to Adelaide)

REASONS FOR DECISION

This application commenced on 28 July 1999 when the applicant sought against the respondent orders in effect restraining the respondent from using the Carrick Hill logo and to have transferred to the applicant a trademark in the name of the respondent. The evidence satisfies me that the respondent has acknowledged that the applicant is entitled to the relief which it has claimed. It has in fact transferred or assigned that mark to the applicant. In practical terms, the applicant has succeeded in obtaining the relief which it seeks and now seeks no other order from the Court other than costs.
In those circumstances, in my view, it is appropriate to make no order on the application except on the question of costs. Because of the success of the applicant against the respondent by its acquiescence and by it transferring the mark, it is appropriate that the respondent should pay the applicant its costs of the application to be taxed. I so order.
Accordingly, the orders are: No order on the application except that the respondent pay to the applicant its costs of the application to be taxed.

I certify that the preceding three (3) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Decision herein of the Honourable Justice Mansfield.
Associate:
Dated: 4 November 1999

Counsel for the Applicant: Mr W Lines

Solicitors for the Applicant: Crown Solicitor for the State of South Australia

No appearance by or on behalf of the Respondent

Date of Hearing: 19 October 1999

Date of Decision: 19 October 1999

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Carrick Hill Trust brought an action against Andrew Garrett Vineyard Estates Pty Ltd in the Federal Court of Australia, South Australia District Registry, seeking orders to prevent the respondent from using the Carrick Hill logo and to transfer a trademark to the applicant. The respondent had acknowledged that the applicant was entitled to the relief claimed and had transferred the trademark to the applicant. The court was required to decide whether the applicant was entitled to the relief it sought, and if so, what orders should be made. The court found that the applicant had succeeded in obtaining the relief it sought, and the respondent had transferred the mark to the applicant. The court determined that it was appropriate to make no order on the application except on the question of costs. The court ordered that the respondent pay the applicant its costs of the application to be taxed. The court found it appropriate to make no order on the application except that the respondent should pay the applicant its costs of the application to be taxed.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY	S 63 OF 1999

BETWEEN:	CARRICK HILL TRUST APPLICANT
AND:	ANDREW GARRETT VINEYARD ESTATES PTY LIMITED (ACN 076 150 260) RESPONDENT
JUDGE:	MANSFIELD J
DATE:	19 OCTOBER 1999
PLACE:	DARWIN (via video link-up to Adelaide)

Counsel for the Applicant:	Mr W Lines
Solicitors for the Applicant:	Crown Solicitor for the State of South Australia
No appearance by or on behalf of the Respondent
Date of Hearing:	19 October 1999
Date of Decision:	19 October 1999