IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA )
)
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY ) No. VG 640 of 1996
)
GENERAL DIVISION )
BETWEEN: CARP NOMINEES PTY LTD (ACN 004 797 746)
(First Applicant)
AND: RCR RUBBER & GENERAL DISTRIBUTORS PTY LTD
(ACN 004 797 755)
(Second Applicant)
AND: AUSTRALIAN SPECIALITY CHEMICALS PTY LTD
(ACN 060 734 901)
(Respondent)
CORAM: Ryan J
DATE: 31 October 1996
PLACE: Melbourne
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
RYAN J: It may be that some, or all of the matters urged by Mr Maryniak on behalf of the respondent will prove cogent in persuading a Judge considering the matter later, to make an order for costs of the motion for interlocutory relief in favour of the respondent. However, those matters should be no less persuasive to a Judge determining the substantive issues, and being fully apprised of all of the matters relevant to the exercise of discretion in respect of the costs of the motion for interlocutory relief than they are now.
On the other hand, I consider that to make a peremptory order for costs in the present circumstances may operate to discourage litigants from taking the sensible course, which has been taken in this case, of agreeing that the hearing of the motion should be treated as the trial of the action. In all the circumstances, I consider the appropriate course is to reserve the costs of the motion. Accordingly, the orders that I make are:
A.BY CONSENT:
That the applicant file and serve an amended application and an amended statement of claim on or before 1 November 1996 and the respondent file and serve its defence in any cross-claim on or before 8 November 1996;
That each party give discovery to the other on or before 15 November 1996 and permit inspection of the other parties discovered documents on or before 18 November 1996;
That subject to any order of the trial judge evidence in this proceeding be given by way of affidavits;
That any affidavits to be relied on by the applicant be filed and served by 28 November 1996;
That any affidavits to be relied upon by the respondents be filed and served by 12 December 1996;
That any affidavits in reply to be relied upon by the applicant be filed and served by 19 December 1996;
That the matter be placed in the list of cases to be called over on 1 November 1996 to be fixed for hearing with such priority as the Judge conducting the callover is able to accord it, the estimated duration of the trial being noted as two to three days.
B.AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED:
That the applicant's costs of the motion on notice dated 18 October 1996 be reserved.
I certify that this and the preceding two (2) pages are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment of his Honour Justice Ryan.
Associate:
Date:
Counsel for the applicants : Mr B.N. Caine
Solicitors for the applicants : Lander & Rogers
Counsel for the respondent : Mr A.J. Maryniak
Solicitors for the respondent : Blake Dawson Waldron
Date of Hearing : 31 October 1996
Date of Judgment : 31 October 1996
- AGLC
- Carp Nominees Pty Ltd (ACN 004 797 746) v RCR Rubber and General Distributors Pty Ltd (ACN 004 797 755) [1996] FCA 1002
- Case
- [1996] FCA 1002
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue in this case was whether the court should grant the respondent's application for costs in relation to the motion for interlocutory relief. The applicants had agreed to treat the motion hearing as the trial of the action, which raised questions about the appropriate exercise of discretion concerning costs. Justice Ryan had to weigh the arguments presented by Mr Maryniak, counsel for the respondent, and consider whether a peremptory order for costs would discourage litigants from taking a similar course of action in the future.
Justice Ryan concluded that making a peremptory order for costs in the present circumstances might discourage litigants from agreeing to treat the hearing of the motion as the trial of the action. Therefore, the court found it appropriate to reserve the costs of the motion. The court issued several procedural orders to manage the case, including deadlines for filing and serving amended applications, statements of claim, defences, cross-claims, discovery, and affidavits. The applicants' costs for the motion were reserved, and the case was placed in the list of cases to be called over on November 1, 1996, with an estimated trial duration of two to three days.
The final orders included consent orders for the applicants to file and serve an amended application and statement of claim, and the respondent to file and serve its defence in any cross-claim, all by specific dates. The parties were also ordered to give discovery to each other and permit inspection of discovered documents by specified deadlines. Affidavits were to be filed and served by the applicants, respondents, and in reply, with specific deadlines. The matter was to be fixed for hearing with priority, and the applicants' costs for the motion were reserved.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.