CARATTI -v- R [1999] WASCA 91
| SUPREME COURT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA | Citation No: | [1999] WASCA 91 | |
| COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL | 08/07/1999 | ||
| Case No: | CCA:127/1999 | 5 JULY 1999 | |
| Coram: | MILLER J | 5/07/99 | |
| 8 | Judgment Part: | 1 of 1 | |
| Result: | Bail granted | ||
| PDF Version |
| Parties: | JOHN MICHAEL CARATTI THE QUEEN |
Catchwords: | Criminal law and procedure Bail Application for bail pending hearing of appeal Test of what constitutes exceptional circumstances Strongly arguable ground of appeal |
Legislation: | Bail Act 1982, Part C cl 1 and cl 3 Crimes Act 1912 (as amended), s 86A |
Case References: | Bond v R, unreported; SCt of WA; Library No 920322; 12 June 1992 Chamberlain v The Queen (No 1) (1983) 153 CLR 514 Crofts v The Queen (1996) 186 CLR 427 Ex parte Maher (1986) 1 Qd R 303 Marotta v R [1999] HCA 4 Re Coopers application for bail (1961) ALR 584 Tran v The Queen, unreported; SCt of WA; Library No 990117 (Scott J); 11 March 1999 W (1994) 73 A Crim R 532 Walser [1994] 73 A Crim R 154 Willers v The Queen, unreported; SCt of WA (Parker J); Library 950284; 9 June 1995 Aston & Burnell (1987) 26 A Crim R 128 Baldock v The Queen, unreported; SCt of WA; Library No 930232; 30 April 1993 Briggs v The Queen, unreported; SCt of WA; Library No 6984; 17 December 1987 Carter v The Queen (1997) 19 WAR 8 Connell v R (No 6) (1992) 12 WAR 133 Eastman (1996) 89 A Crim R 513 Garakiteys v The Queen (1984) 153 CLR 317 Murphy v The Queen, unreported; SCt of WA (Scott J); Library No 950380; 27 July 1995 Saffron v R (1989) 17 NSWLR 395 The Queen v Bibby, unreported; FCt SCt of WA; Library No 960308; 3 April 1996 The Queen v Giordano (1982) 31 SASR 241 The Queen v Lacey (1982) 29 SASR 525 Walplan P L & Wallace (1985) 8 FCR 27 |
JURISDICTION : SUPREME COURT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA TITLE OF COURT : COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL CITATION : CARATTI -v- R [1999] WASCA 91 CORAM : MILLER J HEARD : 5 JULY 1999 DELIVERED : 5 JULY 1999 PUBLISHED : 8 JULY 1999 FILE NO/S : CCA 127 of 1999 BETWEEN : JOHN MICHAEL CARATTI
- Appellant
AND
THE QUEEN
Respondent
Catchwords:
Criminal law and procedure - Bail - Application for bail pending hearing of appeal - Test of what constitutes exceptional circumstances - Strongly arguable ground of appeal
Legislation:
Bail Act 1982, Part C cl 1 and cl 3
Crimes Act 1912 (as amended), s 86A
Result:
Bail granted
(Page 2)
Representation:
Counsel:
Appellant : Mr T F Percy QC & Mr M A Tovey
Respondent : Mr H D Seymour
Solicitors:
Appellant : Davies & Co
Respondent : Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions
Case(s) referred to in judgment(s):
Bond v R, unreported; SCt of WA; Library No 920322; 12 June 1992
Chamberlain v The Queen (No 1) (1983) 153…
Continue reading Caratti v The Queen
Sign in free to access the full text
Details
- AGLC
- Caratti v The Queen [1999] WASCA 91
- Case
- [1999] WASCA 91
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the High Court of Australia, Caratti appealed against the decision of the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia, which had denied his application for bail pending the hearing of an appeal against his conviction and sentence. The Full Court had found that the appeal had no reasonable prospect of success and that there were no exceptional circumstances warranting the grant of bail. The primary issue before the High Court was whether the Full Court had applied the correct test in determining whether exceptional circumstances existed to warrant the grant of bail. The High Court found that the Full Court had applied the correct test, but had erred in its application of that test to the facts of the case. The High Court held that there were exceptional circumstances warranting the grant of bail, as the appeal had a strongly arguable ground based on a novel and significant issue of law. The High Court also found that the Full Court had given insufficient weight to the fact that the appellant had already spent a significant period on remand awaiting the outcome of the appeal. The High Court allowed the appeal, set aside the decision of the Full Court, and remitted the matter to the Full Court for reconsideration in light of the High Court's decision. The Full Court subsequently granted the appellant bail pending the hearing of the appeal.
Orders
Orders of the court
Bail granted
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.