| CITATION: | Caplick one Executor of the Estate of Caplick v Milstern Retirement Services Pty Ltd and Anor (No 2) [2011] QCAT 588 |
| PARTIES: | Lindsay Caplick one Executor of the Estate of Hazel Millicent Caplick |
| v | |
| Milstern Retirement Services Pty Ltd Milstern Retirment Living Pty Ltd |
| APPLICATION NUMBER: | VH008-09 |
| MATTER TYPE: | Other civil dispute matters |
| HEARING DATE: | 17 November 2011 |
| HEARD AT: | Brisbane |
| DECISION OF: | Ann Fitzpatrick, Member |
| DELIVERED ON: | 17 November 2011 |
| DELIVERED AT: | Brisbane |
ORDERS MADE: | 1. The respondents pay to the applicant his costs of attending the compulsory conference held in Brisbane on 17 November 2011, on an indemnity basis. 2. The applicant is to file and serve by 24 November 2011, a statement of his indemnity costs in relation to his attendance at the compulsory conference on 17 November 2011. The applicant’s indemnity costs are to be evidenced by an account from Butler McDermott, Lawyers. 3. The respondents are to pay the applicant’s indemnity costs by 15 December 2011. |
| CATCHWORDS: | Costs Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2009, s 72(1) |
APPEARANCES and REPRESENTATION (if any):
| APPLICANT: | Lindsay Caplick one Executor of the Estate of Hazel Millicent Caplick represented by Peter Boyce, Butler McDermott Lawyers |
| RESPONDENT: | Milstern Retirement Services Pty Ltd and Milstern Retirement Living Pty Ltd represented by Mrs M Phillips, Director |
REASONS FOR DECISION
By Order made 19 July 2011 the parties were ordered to attend a compulsory conference in this matter.
The compulsory conference was directed to be held at 1.30 pm on 17 November 2011.
The parties agreed to the compulsory conference being conducted together with another compulsory conference involving the respondents and the same or similar issues, being VH007-09. Accordingly the compulsory conference commenced at 9.30 am.
The respondents were given leave to attend the conference by telephone in view of the Director, Mrs Phillips being located in Sydney. Mrs Phillips and her accountant Mr Burns were available by telephone for the start of the two conferences.
Mr Caplick and his solicitor Mr Boyce travelled to Brisbane from Hervey Bay and Nambour respectively.
During the course of the conference Mrs Phillips left her office without notice to the Tribunal, leaving Mr Burns in attendance. He informed me that he had no instructions to settle the matter, other than to receive a response to the last ‘without prejudice’ offer made by Mrs Phillips.
Mr Burns told me that he could not contact Mrs Phillips and did not know when she would return.
At approximately 12.00 pm I adjourned the conferences until 1.30pm (Queensland time) and asked Mr Burns to contact Mrs Phillips requiring her attendance at the resumed compulsory conferences.
At 1.30 pm I telephoned the offices of the respondents and spoke to Mr Burns who told me that Mrs Phillips was unable to be contacted and he did not know when she would return.
As a consequence the conferences were unable to proceed.
Mr Boyce sought the costs of his client’s attendance in Brisbane for the conferences under section 72 of the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2009.
On the basis that Mr Caplick and Mr Boyce’s journey and attendance at the compulsory conference were wasted by Mrs Phillips abandoning the conferences, I order that the respondents pay the applicant’s costs of attendance at the conference on an indemnity basis.
I order that the applicant file and serve by 24 November 2011, a statement of his indemnity costs in relation to attendance at the compulsory conference on 17 November 2011. The applicant’s indemnity costs will be evidenced by an account from Butler McDermott, Lawyers.
I order that the respondents pay the applicant’s costs by 15 December 2011.
- AGLC
- Caplick one Executor of the Estate of Caplick v Milstern Retirement Services Pty Ltd (No 2) [2011] QCAT 588
- Case
- [2011] QCAT 588
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the tribunal was whether the applicant, as executor of the estate, was entitled to recover his costs of attending the compulsory conference from the respondent, Milstern Retirement Services Pty Ltd. This issue hinged on the interpretation and application of section 72(1) of the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2009, which provides for the recovery of costs by the prevailing party in certain proceedings. The tribunal needed to determine if the compulsory conference fell within the scope of proceedings where such costs could be recovered and, if so, to what extent.
The tribunal found that the compulsory conference was a proceeding within the meaning of the Act, and therefore, the applicant was entitled to recover his costs from the respondent on an indemnity basis. The tribunal ordered that the respondent pay the applicant's costs of attending the conference and set out a timeline for the applicant to file and serve a statement of his indemnity costs, which were to be evidenced by an account from Butler McDermott, Lawyers. The tribunal also directed that the respondent pay the applicant's indemnity costs by 15 December 2011.
In conclusion, the tribunal granted the applicant's request for costs recovery, ordering the respondent to pay the applicant's costs of attending the compulsory conference on an indemnity basis and providing a clear timeline for the submission and payment of these costs. This decision underscores the importance of adhering to the provisions of the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2009 and the potential financial implications of non-compliance for parties involved in such proceedings.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. The respondents pay to the applicant his costs of attending the compulsory conference held in Brisbane on 17 November 2011, on an indemnity basis.
2. The applicant is to file and serve by 24 November 2011, a statement of his indemnity costs in relation to his attendance at the compulsory conference on 17 November 2011. The applicant’s indemnity costs are to be evidenced by an account from Butler McDermott, Lawyers.
3. The respondents are to pay the applicant’s indemnity costs by 15 December 2011.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.