Capital Duplicators Pty Ltd & Anor v Australian Capital Territory
Case
•
[1992] HCATrans 353
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Capital Duplicators Pty Ltd & Anor v Australian Capital Territory [1992] HCATrans 353
[1992] HCATrans 353
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the High Court of Australia, Capital Duplicators Pty Ltd and Luhaze ACT Pty Ltd were the plaintiffs, and the Australian Capital Territory was the defendant. The dispute concerned questions reserved for the Court's determination.
The primary legal issue before the Court was the determination of question 1 of the questions reserved.
The Court reasoned that as question 1 had been argued as a discrete issue at its direction, the plaintiffs were entitled to their costs associated with that specific question. Accordingly, the Court ordered that the defendant, the Australian Capital Territory, pay the plaintiffs' costs of question 1 of the questions reserved.
The primary legal issue before the Court was the determination of question 1 of the questions reserved.
The Court reasoned that as question 1 had been argued as a discrete issue at its direction, the plaintiffs were entitled to their costs associated with that specific question. Accordingly, the Court ordered that the defendant, the Australian Capital Territory, pay the plaintiffs' costs of question 1 of the questions reserved.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Costs
-
Appeal
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
0
Statutory Material Cited
0