Capital Duplicators Pty Ltd & Anor v Australian Capital Territory
[1992] HCATrans 353
| IN THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA |
Registry No CS of 1990 B e t w e e n -
CAPITAL DUPLICATORS PTY LTD
and LUHAZE ACT PTY LTD
Plaintiffs
and
AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY
and COMMISSIONER FOR
AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY
REVENUE
Defendants
Cost Orders
MASON CJ
BRENNAN J
DEANE J
DAWSON J
TOOHEY J
| Capital(2) | 68 | 8/12/92 |
GAUDRON J
McHUGH J
TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS
AT CANBERRA ON TUESDAY, 8 DECEMBER 1992, AT 10.23 AM
(Continued from 15/10/92)
Copyright in the High Court of Australia
| MASON CJ: | As question 1 of the questions reserved was |
argued as a discrete issue, and as the Court
directed that it should be so argued, the Court
considers that the plaintiffs are entitled to their
costs on that issue.
The order of the Court is: order that the
defendants pay the plaintiffs' costs of question 1
of the questions reserved.
AT 10.24 AM THE MATTER WAS ADJOURNED SINE DIE
| Capital(2) | 69 | 8/12/92 |
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Costs
-
Appeal
0
0
0