Capital Duplicators Pty Ltd & Anor v Australian Capital Territory

Case

[1992] HCATrans 353

No judgment structure available for this case.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Registry No CS of 1990

B e t w e e n -

CAPITAL DUPLICATORS PTY LTD

and LUHAZE ACT PTY LTD

Plaintiffs

and

AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY

and COMMISSIONER FOR

AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY

REVENUE

Defendants

Cost Orders

MASON CJ
BRENNAN J
DEANE J

DAWSON J

TOOHEY J

Capital(2) 68 8/12/92

GAUDRON J

McHUGH J

TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS

AT CANBERRA ON TUESDAY, 8 DECEMBER 1992, AT 10.23 AM

(Continued from 15/10/92)

Copyright in the High Court of Australia

MASON CJ:  As question 1 of the questions reserved was

argued as a discrete issue, and as the Court

directed that it should be so argued, the Court

considers that the plaintiffs are entitled to their

costs on that issue.

The order of the Court is: order that the

defendants pay the plaintiffs' costs of question 1

of the questions reserved.

AT 10.24 AM THE MATTER WAS ADJOURNED SINE DIE

Capital(2) 69 8/12/92

Areas of Law

  • Civil Procedure

Legal Concepts

  • Costs

  • Appeal

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0