Cape County Coaches Pty Ltd v Redline Coaches Pty Ltd

Case

[1982] FCA 134

14 Jul 1982

No judgment structure available for this case.

IN THE

FEDERfiL T A S M A N I A

COURT

OF AUSTRALIA

)

- 1
D I S T R I C T R E G I S T R Y 1 T. N o . G . 3 of 1981
1
G E N E R A L D I V I S J O N _-- )
BETWEEN: 
CAPE COUNTY COACHES PTY. LIMITED I A p p l i c a n t

and

REDLINE COACHES PTY. LTD. R e s p o n d z p t
ORDER c
JUDGE :  N o r t h r o p J.
WHERE MADE:  C a n b e r r a
DATE :  14 J u l y 1 9 8 2
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The f u r t h e r hear ing of the a p p l i c a t i o n be adjourned t o
a da te to be f i x e d .
2 . E a c h p a r t y have l- iberty t o apply.
3 . C o s t s be reserved.

I .

.

I N THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

1 1

TASMANIA DISTRICT REGISTRY
1 T. No. G . 3 of 1981
1
GENERAL D I V I S I O N 1
BETWEEN: 
CAPE COUNTY COACHES PTY. LIMITED Appl icant

and

REDLINE COACHES PTY. LTD. Respondent

.

I

NORTHROP J. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT 1 4 JULY 1982.
Cape County Coaches Pty. Limited, "the applicant",
a co rpora t ion unde r t he T rade P rac t i ces Act 1 9 7 4 a s amended,
" t h e Act", conducts a passenger coach s e r v i c e on t h e route
Hobart-Smithton-Hobart using coaches described as C o a s t l i n e r
Expresses. Redline Coaches Pty. Ltd., " t h e respondent" , a
corpora t ion under the Act, conducts passenger coach services
i n many p a r t s of Tasmania by coaches descr ibed as Tasmanian
Redline Coaches. I n a d d i t i o n t o ca r ry ing pas senge r s , t he
a p p l i c a n t and the respondent carry passengers ' luggage and
o t h e r items of f r e i g h t . -
_*__________. . - - - .-- - --- ..
. . . . . . . .

,

- 2 -

I n Tasmania t h e power t o c o n t r o l and regula te coach
t r a n s p o r t by road , o the r t han by any bus se rv ice opera ted by
t h e M e t r o p o l i t a n T r a n s p o r t T r u s t , is c o n f e r r e d on t h e
Transport Commission by s t a t u t o r y p r o v i s i o n s , see t h e T r a f f i c
- A c t 1925 (Tas . ) , T ranspor t Act 1981 (Tas . ) and r egu la t ions
made pursuant t o those Acts. I t is no t necessa ry f o r t h e
purposes of these r e a s o n s t o make d e t a i l e d r e f e r e n c e t o t h e
s t a t u t o r y p r o v i s i o n s . Under those p rov i s ions t h e T ranspor t
Commission is empowered t o g r a n t licences t o p e r s o n s t o
- p r o v i d e c o a c h s e r v i c e s b e t w e e n d i f f e r e n t p l a c e s w i t h i n
Tasmania nd t o impose r e s t r i c t i o n s a n d c o n d i t i o n s r e l a t i n g ,
t o t h e ope ra t ion o f s e rv i ces pu r suan t t o t h o s e l i c e n c e s . I t

I

is unlawful for persons t o conduct coach s e r v i c e s w i t h o u t
such a l i c e n c e .
A t a l l r e l e v a n t times t h e a p p l i c a n t h e l d a l i ce i l ce
t o o p e r a t e a coach s e rv i ce from Smi th ton t o Hobar t v i a
Launceston and re turn . The s e r v i c e was t o o p e r a t e f i v e d a y s
a week on Mondays t o F r i d a y s i n c l u s i v e . The s e r v i c e was n o t
operated over the weekend. Among t h e c o n d i t i o n s imposed w i t h
r e s p e c t t o t h e l i c e n c e were the fo l lowing:
"A Between Smithton and Hobart
( i ) there s h a l l be no r e s t r i c t i o n s o n
t h e p u t down of passengers who
commence t h e i r t r i p west o f
Somerset.
(i i) pick up of passengers i s only
permitted between:

Smithtcn - Devonport

Prospec t - Launceston - P e r t h .
(iii) p u t down of p a s s e n g e r s is
permit ted only between:

Prospec t - Launceston - P e r t h

Brighton - Hobart .

B Between Hobart and Smithton
( i ) t h e r e s h a l l b e no r e s t r i c t i o n s on
the p i ck up of passengers whose
d e s t i n a t i o n s a r e p o i n t s west Of
Somerset.
(ii) p a s s e n g e r s o f u p p i c k i s
permi t ted only between:
Hobart - Brighton l
P e r t h - Launceston - Prospec t .
(iii) p u t down o f p a s s e n g e r s i s
permi t ted only between:
P e r t h - Launceston - Prospec t

Devonport - Smithton."

-

The e f f e c t o f t h e t i m e t a b l e s c h e d u l e a t t a c h e d t o t h e licence

I

was t h a t t h e coach should not depart f rom specif ied towns
b e f o r e t h e times s p e c i f i e d t h e r e i n . On the journey f rom
Smithton, t h e p l a c e s so s p e c i f i e d were between Burnie and
Devonport inc lus ive , and a t Launceston. For the purposes Of
t h i s a p p l i c a t i o n , P r o s p e c t and P e r t h are t r e a t e d a s b e i n g t h e
equivalent of Launceston, w h i l e Brighton and Bridgewater are
t r e a t e d as be ing the qu iva len t o f Hobart. The e f f e c t Of
these conditions car, be summarised. On the journey Smithton
to Hobar t a passenger who commenced a journey west of
Somerset, a town a s h o r t d i s t a n c e west of Burn ie , could
comple t e t he j ou rney a t any po in t on t h e rou te t o Hobar t .
Passengers could board t h e coach a t p o i n t s b e t w e e n B u r n i e snd
Devonport inclusive provided t h e i r j ou rney t e rmina ted a t
e i ther Launceston Hobart . r On t h e journey Hobar t to
Smithton, a passenger who was t r a v e l l i n g t o a n y p o i n t west Of
Somerset could commence a journey a t any po in t on the rou te
f rom Hobart o therwise , passengers who boarded the coach a t
Hobart could only terminate the i r jou rney a t Launces ton OK
between Devonport and Somerset. If a passenger boarded the
-. coach a t Launceston that passenger could only terminate the
journey between Devonport and Somerset or points west of
S o m e r s e t . S i m i l a r e s t r i c t i o n s a p p l i e d w i t h r e s p e c t t o t h e I
c a r r i a g e o f r e i g h t . A s between Launceston and Hobart and
Hobart and Launceston, places o were s p e c i f i e d a t which
times were s p e c i f i e d f o r t h e depa r tu re o f t he coach . There
was one coach service each way on each of t h e f i v e w e e k days .
! A t a l l r e l e v a n t times, t h e respondent h e l d a number
o f l i cences t o ope ra t e coach s e rv i ces be tween spec i f i ed
p l a c e s
i n Tasmania. Among t h e l i c e n c e s s o h e l d were t h e

fol lowing:

"J. Hobart to Launceston and return
K. H o b a r t t o Wynyard v i a L a u n c e s t o n ,
Devonport and Burnie.
L. B u r n i e H o b a r t t o v i a D e v o n p o r t a n d
Launces ton. "
Timetable schedules were a t t a c h e d t o e a c h o f t h o s e l i c e n c e s .
The s e r v i c e s were t o be provided seven days a week . A t a l l
r e l e v a n t times, u n d e r t h e "J" l i c e n c e there were f o u r
se rv i ces each way each w e e k day. On three o f t hose s e rv i ces
each way t h e e f f e c t o f t h e s c h e d u l e was t h a t t h e coach should
not depart from specified places between t h e two c i t i e s
b e f o r e s p e c i f i e d times. On one se rv ice each way, namely t h e
4 .00 p.m. se rv ice f rom Hobart and t h e 7.00 a.m. s e r v i c e from
Launceston, there was no s u c h r e s t r i c t i o n . T h e r e were two
se rv ices ach way on Sa tu rdays and on Sundays and t h e
s t a n d a r d r e s t r i c t i o n s as t o times of departure f rom specified
p l a c e s a p p l i e d t o each of t h o s e s e r v i c e s . Under the " K "
l icence p rov i s ion was made f o r f i v e s e r v i c e s e a c h w e e k day
and for two s e r v i c e s on each Saturday and Sunday. Two of the
w e e k d a y s e r v i c e s departed from Launceston an hour after a
coach was due t o a r r i v e from Hobart . Similar t imetabl ing
enab led pas senge r s f rom Hobar t t o con t inue t o Burn ie o r
Wynyard on the Sa tu rday or S u n d a y s e r v i c e s . S i m i l a r
schedul ing a l lowed passengers f rom Burnie on some of t h e
s e r v i c e s t o c o n n e c t w i t h s e r v i c e s t o H o b a r t . The e f f e c t of
the schedules was t h a t t h e coaches hould not depart from
specified towns between Launceston and Burnie before t h e
times s p e c i f i e d i n t h e t i m e t a b l e s . Some the of coaches
t rave l led v ia Kimber ley and Rai l ton while o t h e r s t r a v e l l e d

v i a F o r t h . l i c e n s e d c o a c h r o u t e s e r v i c e c o v e r i n g p a r t o f

One

s e r v i c e

was

i n

substance

p a r t

o f

a n o t h e r

t h e same r o u t e .
The Burn ie t o Wynyard s e c t i o n was l i m i t e d t o one s e rv i ce on
each w e e k day and on each Saturday to enable p a s s e n g e r s t o
t r a v e l on t h e 2 . 0 0 p.m. coach from Hobart t o Launceston and
t h e n t o Wynyard. Under t h e "L" l i c e n c e p r o v i s i o n was made

fo r fou r Saturday

s e rv i ces

each

w e e k

day

and

f o r

two

s e r v i c e s on

each

and Sunday. Three of the w e e k day s e rv i ces , one o f

t h e S a t u r d a y connected w i t h services a t Launceston

s e r v i c e s

and

e a c h

o f

t h e

S u n d a y

s e r v i c e s

for Hobart Timetable .
schedules had t h e same e f f e c t a s t h o s e i n t h e " K " l i c e n c e .
Under a l l l i c e n c e s , except w i t h i n t h e suburban a r e a s o f
Hobar t and Launces ton , there vas no res t r ic t ion on t h e
p ick ing up or p u t t i n g down of passengers or f r e i g h t . AS from
l A u g u s t 1 9 8 1 a new c o n d i t i o n was imposed i n r e l a t i o n - t o a l l
l i c e n c e s h e l d by the respondent . The c o n d i t i o n was a s

!

fo l lows:

!

"5 . The word 'Express' m u s t n o t be used i n
any adve r t i s emen t o f s e rv i ces , except i n
r e l a t i o n t o t h e 7 . 0 0 a.m. s e r v i c e from
Launceston t o Hobart and t h e 3 . 4 5 p.m.
s e r v i c e from Hobart t o Launceston."
The 3 . 4 5 p.m. serv ice f rom Hobar t to Launces ton had r ep laced
t h e prev ious 4 .00 p.m. s e r v i c e .
The p r e s e n t c a s e i n essence concerns t h e u s e of t h e
words "Express Service" i n r e l a t i o n t o t h e c o a c h s e r v i c e s
provided by the respondent p u r s u a n t t o t h e l i c e n c e s g r a n t e d
t o it. Compla in t s abou t r e l a t ed ma t t e r s were made a l s o .
During t h e hear ing much evidence was directed to whether the
a p p l i c a n t as well as t h e respondent p rovided an express
s e r v i c e , t h e n a t u r e o f t h e coaches by which t h e s e r v i c e s were
provided and o the r aspects of comparison between t h e s e r v i c e s
provided by t h e a p p l i c a n t and t h e respondent , and t h e h i s t o r y

of t h e proceedings .

in tense

compet i t ion

be tween

them,

i n c l u d i n g

l e g a l

In t h e r e s u l t none t h o f ma t t e r s se a r e
r e l e v a n t t o t h e issues t o be decided i n t h i s a p p l i c a t i o n . No
f u r t h e r reference will be made t o t h a t e v i d e n c e .
The a p p l i c a n t b r i n g s these proceedings under t h e
T r a d e P r a c t i c e s Act s e e k i n g d a m a g e s and a n i n j u n c t i o n
r e s t r a i n i n g t h e respondent from engaging in conduct which
cont ravenes t h e p r o v i s i o n s of t h e Act.
T h e c o m p l a i n t s a r i s e out of a number of
a d v e r t i s e m e n t s p u b l i s h e d a t t h e i n s t r u c t i o n of t h e
respondent . On each Wednesday and Saturday from about
September 1980 about to August 1981 there appeared the
f o l l o w i n g c l a s s i f i e d a d v e r t i s e m e n t , h e r e i n a f t e r r e f e r r e d t o
as " t h e f i r s t adve r t i s emen t" , i n t h e "Advocate" newspaper:
n AAAA

TASMhNIAN REDLINE
COACHES
'EXPRESS

SERVICE'

Monday t o F r i d a y D ' p o r t - L' ton - D'por t .
Depart ing D-svonport 7 . 3 0 a. a r r i v i n g m.
Launceston 6.45 a.m. w i t h c o n t i n u i n g s e r v i c e
through t o H o b a r t , a r r i v i n g 1 2 midday. Depart
Launceston 5.15 p.m. a r r i v i n g Devonport 6 .30
w i t h 2 p.m. c o n n e c t i n g s e r v i c e from Hobart.

Devonport - Hobart Monday to Friday.

7.30 a,m., 10.40 a.m., 3.15 p.m. 7.30 p.m.

(L'ton only). Sat 10.45 a.m., 3.15 p.m. (L'ton
only) .
Burnie - Hobart Monday to Friday.
9.15 a.m. - 2 p.m., 6.30 p.m. (L'ton only).
Sat. 9.15 a.m. , 2 p.m. (L'ton only).

Sun. 10 a.m. and 4.30 p.m."

Thereafter the advertisement specified some of the fares
charged, an invitation to the public to make enquiries of the

respondent and the addresses and telephone numbers of a

-

number of depots conducted. The applicant complains that

*

none of the services referred to in the first advertisement
were express services and that the timetables referred to

were not adhered to by the respondent.

i On each Wednesday and Saturday from about September

1980 to the date of issue of the application, November 1981,

there appeared the following classified advertisement,

! ' hereinafter referred to as "the second advertisement" in the
"Advocate" newspaper:
n AAAAAA

TASMANIAN REDLINE

COACHES

BURNIE

ULVERSTONE
DEVONPORT

LAUNCESTON

HOBART

7 days a week.

.

I

- 9 -

*WE NEVER STOP*

COMPARE OUR PRICES

Burnie to Launceston $9.50 Launceston to Hobart $9.70

50% discount for pensioners.

All central city depots for convenience."

Thereafter the advertisement gave the addresses and telephone numbers of a number of the respondent's depots. The applicant complains that the second advertisement constituted

a statement that the services were express services when in

fact they were not.

From about September 1980, the respondent published

and distributed a timetable with effect from 1 September

1980. One

hereinafter referred to as "the third advertisement" was as
follows:

of the services set out in the timetable,
" E-X-P-R-E-S-S

DEVONPORT-LAUNCESTON

I
DEPART DEVONPORT:
Monday to Friday - 1 . 3 0 am (Through
service to Hobart)

DEPART LAUNCESTON:

Monday to Friday - 5.15 pm (2 pm ex Hbt.
connects with
E.O.A.)"

-_

.

- 10 -

The a p p l i c a n t c o m p l a i n s t h a t t h o s e s e r v i c e s were n o t e x p r e s s
s e z v i c e s . Other s e r v i c e s were a l s o r e f e r r e d t o i n t h e
timetable b u t r e f e r e n c e need be made t o three of them only.
Apar t f rom those re fe r red to in t h e t h i r d adver t i sement , t h e
t ime tab le se t o u t t h e s e r v i c e s on t h e Launceston-Burnie route
w i t h n o t i f i c a t i o n of t h e v a r i a t i o n i n t h o s e s e r v i c e s i n
accordance w i t h t h e s c h e d u l e s t o t h e l i c e n c e a n d a l s o t h e
Launceston-Hobart route , together w i t h c o n n e c t i n g s e r v i c e s t o
B u r n i e and Wynyard. There was a s e p a r a t e a d v e r t i s e m e n t f o r
t h e t w o L a u n c e s t o n - H o b a r t s e r v i c e s w h i c h had no times
s p e c i f i e d between Hobart and Launceston. Those two daily
s e r v i c e s were a d v e r t i s e d as fo l lows:

E-X-P-R-E-S-S

LAUNCESTON-HOBART

DEPART LAUNCESTON:

Monday F r i d a y t o - 7.00 am

DEPART HOBART:

l

Monday F r i d a y t o - 4 . 0 0 pm"
The a p p l i c a n t makes no complaint i n r e l a t i o n t o t h i s .
I
The respondent adver t i sed i n t h e "Yellow Pages" i n

each of Southern

t h e

1 9 8 0

and

1981

t e l e p h o n e

d i r e c t o r i e s

f o r

t h e

Tasmania, North and Northwestern Tasmania and North
West and West Coas t Tasmania a reas respec t ive ly . These
adver t i sements are her<inaf te r referred t o as " t h e f o u r t h
a d v e r t i s e m e n t " . I n t h o s o n e d i r e c t o r i e s f t h e
adve r t i s emen t con ta ins t h e words:
"Tasmanian Redl ine Coaches Statevide Charter
E x p r e s s P a s s e n g e r & P a r c e l S r v i c e s
Throughout Tasmania

Connecting A l l Areas. "

The o t h e r f i v e a d v e r t i s e m e n t s c o n t a i n t h e words:
"Tasmanian R e d l i n e Coaches
Express Passenger & Parcel S e r v i c e s
Covering Tasmania."

-

The app l i can t compla ins t h a t t h e s e r v i c e s p r o v i d e d by t h e
r e sponden t a r e no t express s e r v i c e s and t h a t t h e respondent
d o e s n o t p r o v i d e s e r v i c e s t o a l l par t s of Tasmania .
! The a p p l i c a n t re l ies upon s e c t i o n s 52(1), 5 3 ( a a )
and 55A. Under s e c t i o n 52(1) a c o r p o r a t i o n s h a l l n o t , i n
t r a d e o r commerce, engage i n c o n d u c t h a t is misleading o r
decep t ive o r is l i k e l y t o mislead o r dece ive . Under s e c t i o n
5 3 ( a a ) , a c o r p o r a t i o n s h a l l n o t , i n t r a d e o r commerce, i n
connexion wi th the supply o r poss ib le supply of s e r v i c e s or
i n connexion w i t h t h e prcmotion of t h e supp ly o f s e rv i ces
f a l s e l y r e p r e s e n t t h a t s e r v i c e s a r e of a p a r t i c u l a r standard,
q u a l i t y or grade . Under s e c t i o n 55A, a c o r p o r a t i o n s h a l l
n o t , i n trade o r commerce, engage in conduc t t h a t is l i a b l e
to mislead t h e p u b l i c a s t o t h e n a t u r e , t h e c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s
o r t h e q u a l i t y of any s e rv i ces . The a p p l i c a n t c o n t e n d s t h a t

t h e f o u r conduct by the

a d v e r t i s e m e n t s

a l r e a d y

r e f e r r e d

t o

c o n s t i t u t e

respondent which contravenes each of t h e s e

p rov i s ions .

The respondent i s a c o r p o r a t i o n unde r t h e Act. I n
provid ing the coach se rv ices i n Tasmania i t is engaging i n
t r a d e o r commerce under t h e Act. The conduct common t o each

of t h e four s e c t i o n s is

advert isements which

is

a l l e g e d

t o c o n t r a v e n e

t h e

a statement t h a t t h e c o a c h s e r v i c e s a r e e x p r e s s
s e r v i c e s . Under s e c t i o n 52 i t is f o r t h e C o u r t t o d e c i d e
whether par t icu lar conduct i s mis l ead ing o r decep t ive o r is
! l i k e l y t o mislead o r dece ive hav ing r ega rd t o t he t ype of
p e r s o n l i k e l y t o be exposed t o t h a t c o n d u c t . I n t h e p r e s e n t
ca se , t he t ype of p e r s o n l i k e l y t o be exposed t o t h e conduct
is a member of t h e p u b l i c who may be d e s i r i n g t o t r a v e l
between Burnie and Hobart, Hobart and Burnie or any places i n
between. T h e r e i s n o e v i d e n c e t h a t a n y p e r s o n h a s i n f a c t
been mislead or dece ived b u t t h a t is not conc lus ive one way
o r ano the r . The ex is tence o f such ev idence l ikewise i s n o t
conclus ive . T h i s is a q u e s t i o n t o be decided by t h e Court
hav ing r ega rd p rac t i ca l t o cons ide ra t ions . I t cannot be
decided i n t h e a b s t r a c t . I t should no t be decided on t o o
narrow a ground. I t should no t be decided upon any s t r i c t l y
l e g a l c o n s i d e r a t i o n or cons t ruc t ion o f words and phrases , b u t
on t h e b a s i s o f how t h e conduct would be understood by t h e

t y p e o f a p p r o a c h e s

p e r s o n

l i k e l y

t o

be

exposed

t o

i t .

S i m i l a r

a r e t o be adopted w i t h r e s p e c t t o t h e o b l i g a t i o n s
imposed on c o r p o r a t i o n s by t h e o t h e r two s e c t i o n s o f t h e Act
and a l l eged con t r aven t ions the reo f .
A s a f i r s t step it is necessary to de te rmine what
is meant by the words "Expres s Se rv ice" appea r ing i n the
f i r s t a d v e r t i s e m e n t , h e word "Express" appearing in t h e
t h i r d advert isement , and the words "Express Passenger &
P a r c e l S e r v i c e " o r " E x p r e s s P a s s e n g e r & P a r c e l S e r v i c e s "
appearing i n the f o u r t h a d v e r t i s e m e n t . The words m u s t be
cons t rued i n t h e c o n t e x t i n which they are used , namely w i t h
r e s p e c t t o c o a c h s e r v i c e s p r o v i d e d by the r spondent i n
accordance w i t h l i c e n c e s g r a n t e d t o i t . I n t h e course of
submissions, counsel referred t o t h e d i c t i o n a r y m e a n i n g s t o

be g i v e n ev idence as

t o

t h e

word

"Expres s" .

In

add i t ion ,

w i tnes ses

gave

t o what they understood was meant by t h e word
"Express", b u t I f i n d t h a t t h a t ev idence is n o t h e l p f u l i n
d e t e r m i n i n g t h e q u e s t i o n b e f o r e t h e C o u r t . T h e word
"Express" has many d i f f e r e n t m e a n i n g s assigned t o i t i n t h e
v a r i o u s d i c t i o n a r i e s referred t o i n t h e course o f
submissions. Many of those meanings obviously have no
bear ing on t h e p r e s e n t q u e s t i o n . I n t h e present c a s e t h e
words form part of t h e composite phrase u s e d i n r e l a t i o n t o
t h e c a r r i a g e o f passengers or f r e i g h t between specif ied
p o i n t s . The m o s t h e l p f u l d e f i n i t i o n appears i n t h e Oxford
Eng l i sh D ic t iona ry , "Spec ia l ly des igned o r i n t ended fo r a
pa r t i cu la r ob jec t ; done , made , or sen t ' on pu rpose . ' ... b.
Express T r a i n . O r i g i n a l l y = 'special t r a i n ' ; b u t about 1845

P

applied t o a t r a i n r u n n i n g ' e x p r e s s l y ' f o r t h e conveyance of
p a s s e n g e r s t o o n e p a r t i c u l a r p l a c e and n o t s t o p p i n g a t t h e
i n t e r m e d i a t e s t a t i o n s ; now, a t r a i n running a t a h i g h r a t e
of speed, and s topping only a t a few i m p o r t a n t s t a t i o n s . "
T h i s d e f i n i t i o n and example i s , i n my op in ion , t he c o r r e c t
meaning t o be g i v e n t o t h e re levant words appear ing in the
th ree adve r t i s emen t s . They a r e used i n r e l a t i o n t o c o a c h
serv ices be tween specified towns. The words a r e t o be
understood as meaning not only a f a s t s e r v i c e by coach b u t
a l s o f e w s t o p s t o p i c k up o r p u t down passengers or f r e i g h t

v

between the commencing and t e rmina t ing po in t s o f t h e s e r v i c e .
T h i s i s t h e meaning i n which t h e words would be understood by
persons exposed to t he adver t i sements . I t is a meaning which
is p r a c t i c a l and i s t o be compared with another type of coach
s e r v i c e a t which s t o p s a r e t o be expected a t numerous p o i n t s
between the commencing and t e rmina t ing po in t s o f t h e s e r v i c e .
The l a t t e r s e r v i c e s may be f a s t , having regard to speed
l limits i m p o s e d b y t r a f f i c r e g u l a t i o n s , b u t i t i s t h e
requirement of being a t i n t e r m e d i a t e p o i n t s a t s p e c i f i c times
for the pu rposes of enab l ing members of t h e p u b l i c t o b o a r d
o r t o disembark from the coach w h i c h i l l u s t r a t e s t h e v i t a l
d i f f e r e n c e b e t w e e n a n e x p r e s s e r v i c e and a non-express
s e r v i c e .
I n o r d e r t o a p p l y t h e meaning of t h e words used t o
t h e se rv i ces p rov ided by t h e respondent , i t is n e c e s s a r y t o
refer t o t h e t i m e t a b l e schedu les a t t a c h e d t o t h e l i c e n c e s .

.

- 15 -

The 7 .00 a.m. service Launceston to Hobart and t h e 3.45 p.m.
o r 4.00 p.m. serv ice Hobar t o Launces ton can be described
t r u l y a s e x p r e s s e r v i c e s . A l t h o u g h on thase s e r v i c e s the
coach is a b l e l a w f u l l y t o s t o p t o a l l o w p a s s e n g e r s t o embark
o r d i s e m b a r k , t h a t i s t h e except ion . The s e r v i c e is designed
on t h e b a s i s t h a t a n y s u c h s t o p would cons t i t u t e an unusua l
departure from the norm. I n f a c t , t h e time s p e c i f i e d i n t h e
schedules f o r the complet ion o€ t h o s e s e r v i c e s is less than
t h e time specified for the o ther se rv ices be tween Launces tcn
and Hobart where i n t e r m e d i a t e s t o p s a r e n o r m a l l y t o be
expected and allowances made f o r t h o s e s t o p s . T h e s e r v i c e s
between Launceston and Burnie and t h e non-express e rv ices
between Launceston and Hobart do not come w i t h i n t h e meaning
of t h e words "Express", "Express Service" , "Express Passenger
& Parcel Serv ice" o r "Express Passenger & Parcel Se rv ices" .
Under t h o s e s e r v i c e s , s c h e d u l e d s t o p s are s p e c i f i e d i n t h e
timetables and the coach should not depar t f rom t h e s p e c i f i e d
places b e f o r e t h e s p e c i f i e d times. I t i s i m m a t e r i a l t h a t t h e
coach may n o t s t o p a t t h e s p e c i f i e d places i f there is no
p a s s e n g e r s e e k i n g t o b o a r d t h e c o a c h o r n o p a s s e n g e r
disembarking. Under t h e licences, r e s t r i c t i o n s a r e p l a c e d on
. t h e

n a t u r e Devonport

o f

t h e

coach

se rv ice .

Even

on

t h e

s h o r t e r

o u t e

to Launces ton intermediate p laces and times have
b e e n s p e c i f i e d t h e r e b y r e s t r i c t i n g t h e progress of the coach.
None of these s e r v i c e s c o n s t i t u t e express s e r v i c e s .
. - .

This view of the meaning to be given to the words "Express" or "Express Service" is supported

by the condition

"5." imposed by the licences issued to the respondent and
operating as from August 19.91. That condition recognises

that apart from the services specified in the condition, the

other services provided by the respondent are not express
services. Likewise, the timetable in which the third
advertisement appears di-aws a clear, and in my opinion valid,
- distinction between the express services between Launceston
i and Hobart and the non-express services between those two
cities.
In the light of the meaning to be given to the
relevant words in the three advertisements it becomes

necessary to consider whether the statements contained in the four advertisements contravene any of the provisions of the Act.

The first advertisement refers to the

Devonport-Launceston-Devonport service with connecting

services to Hobart. Insofar as the words "Express Service" are used, they have the effect of conveying to the relevant members of the public that each of those serviccs is an

express service in the sense already discussed. To that
extent the advertisements constitute conduct which is
misleading or deceptive or is likely to mislead or deceive

contrary to section 52 of the Act, since those services are

not express services. Likewise, the first advertisement
constitutes a contravention by the respondent of section

53(aa) and section 55A of the Act.

In the second advertisement the words complained of

are "We Never Stop". I reject the contention that those
words mean, or would be understood to mean, that the services

are express services. Of necessity the services must stop if
only at the end of the journey. The respondent provides its
services seven days a week and fifty-two weeks a year. The

applicant provides its services five days a week only. In

the context of the advertisement and the factual situation, the words "We Never Stop" refer to this aspect

of the service

and not to express services. The statements contained in the
second advertisement do not constitute a contravention of the

Act by the respondent.

For reasons similar to those applicable to the
first advertisement, the words "Express" appearing in the
third advertisement constitute conduct by the respondent in
contravention of the three provisions of the Act.

One further factor is relevant to the consideration

of the fourth advertisement. All the relevant licences held

5.

by the respondent were in evidence before the Court. Apart

from the express services between Hobart and Launceston, n m e
of t h e services conducted by the r spondent cons t i tu ted
expres s s e rv i ces . Fo r r ea sons similar t o t h o s e a p p l i c a b l e t o
t h e f i r s t advert isement , the words "Express ... Serv ices"
appearing i n t h e f o u r t h a d v e r t i s e m e n t cons t i t u t e conduct by
t h e respondent i n c o n t r a v e n t i o n s f t h e t h r e e p r o v i s i o n s of
the Act.
The o the r compla in t s are now considered. I n t h e
f i r s t adver t i sement i t is s t a t e d t h a t t h e 7.30 a.m. s e r v i c e
- from Devonport connects wi th a s e rv i ce " th rough t o Hobar t ,
a r r i v i n g a t 1 2 midday". I n fac t t h e t i m e t a b l e s show t h a t t h e
scheduled time of a r r i v a l a t Hobart is e i t h e r 12.45 p.m. o r ,
as from a l a t e r d a t e , 1 2 . 1 5 p.m. To t h a t e x t e n t t h e f i r s t
a d v e r t i s e m e n t t e c h n i c a l l y c o n s t i t u t e s c o n d u c t b y t h e
r e sponden t wh ich con t r avenes the th ree sec t ions of t h e Act.
I n t h e f o u r t h a d v e r t i s e m e n t i t is s t a t e d t h a t t h e
s e r v i c e s p r o v i d e d b y t h e r e s p o n d e n t c o n n e c t a l l a r e a s
throughout Tasmania or cover Tasmania. I n f ac t , t h e r o u t e s
o v e r w h i c h t h e r e s p o n d e n t i s l i c e n s e d t o c o n d u c t i t s
services, a l though ve ry ex tens ive , do n o t connect a l l a r e a s
th roughou t Tasman ia nor t h e y d o c o v e r t h e S t a t e .
Never the less , by a r rangement wi th o ther coachl ine opera tors ,
on r e q u e s t by a p rospec t ive pas senge r or pe r son s eek ing t o
despa tch f r e igh t , t he r e sponden t is a b l e t o a r r a n g e c e a c h

1          .

I .  

. .

i - 1 9 -
I t ravel throughout Tasmania. The r e l e v a n t statements i n t h e
I
f o u r t h a d v e x t i s e m e n t i n t h i s r e g a r d o n o t c o n s t i t u t e
cont ravent ions of t h e Act by the respondent .
I n t h e result , t h e s t a t e m e n t s i n three o f t he
a d v e r t i s e m e n t s c o n s t i t u t e c o n d u c t b y t h e r e s p o n d e n t i n
cont ravent ion of the Act i n s o f a r a s t h e y r e f e r t o express
s e r v i c e s , w h i l e t h e s t a t e m e n t r e f e r r i n g t oh e time of
a r r i v a l a t H o b a r t i n t h e t h i r d a d v e r t i s e m e n t c o n s t i t u t e s
i :  conduct by t h e r e sponden t i n con t r aven t ion o f t h e Act. I n
I .
August 1981 t h e respondent ceased to use the o f fending words
appearing i n t h e f i r s t and t h i r d adver t i sements .
A t t h e request o f t h e p a r t i e s , t h e Court permitted
t h e a p p l i c a n t o p resent i t s case o n l i a b i l i t y b e f o r e
e n t e r i n g i n t o i ts case o n t h e n a t u r e of t h e r e l i e f s o u g h t .
Af t e r pub l i sh ing t hese r easons fo r j udgmen t on l i a b i l i t y t h e
f u r t h e r h e a r i n g of t h e a p p l i c a t i o n is a j o u r n e d t o a date t o
be f i x e d . There will be l i b e r t y t o a p p l y .
Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0