CITATION: | Cannon & Anor v Saunders [2017] QCATA 4 |
PARTIES: | Peter Cannon |
| v | |
| John Saunders (Respondent) | |
APPLICATION NUMBER: | APL353-16 |
| MATTER TYPE: | Appeals |
HEARING DATE: | On the papers |
HEARD AT: | Brisbane |
DECISION OF: | Acting Senior Member Paratz |
DELIVERED ON: | 17 January 2017 |
DELIVERED AT: | Brisbane |
ORDERS MADE: | 1. The Application for Miscellaneous Matters filed by Peter Cannon and Cheryl Saunders on 23 November 2016 is dismissed. |
CATCHWORDS: | ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNALS - PROCEDURE – MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MATTERS - APPEALS - Where an application for directions as to service, admission of fresh evidence on appeal, and production of documents, was made. Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2009 (Qld) s 62(3) Lindgren v Aaron Trigg Painting (No 3) [2011] QCATA 268 |
APPEARANCES and REPRESENTATION (if any):
This matter was heard and determined on the papers pursuant to s 32 of the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2009 (Qld) (QCAT Act).
REASONS FOR DECISION
A decision was made in a Residential Tenancies matter by an Adjudicator in the Tribunal at Coolangatta on 28 September 2016.
Peter Cannon and Cheryl Pearson filed an Application for leave to appeal or appeal that decision in the Tribunal on 24 October 2016.
Peter Cannon and Cheryl Pearson filed an Application for Miscellaneous Matters in the Tribunal on 23 November 2016.
I made an Order on the Papers without reasons on 6 December 2016 dismissing the Miscellaneous Application filed on 23 November 2016. Peter Cannon and Cheryl Pearson have requested written reasons for that decision. These are the Reasons for that decision.
Discussion
The decision of the Adjudicator was as follows:
(1) The Residential Tenancy Agreement between the parties be terminated as from midnight on 31 October 2016 on the grounds of failure to leave.
(2) A Warrant of Possession to issue authorising a police officer to enter the premises of 16B Tomewin Street, Currumbin, Qld, 4223.
(3) The Warrant of Possession shall take effect on 1 November 2016 and remain in effect for 14 days, to expire on 14 November 2016.
(4) Entry under the warrant shall only be between the hours of 8.00am and 6.00pm.
A Senior Member of the Tribunal made an order on 28 October 2016 refusing an application by Peter Cannon and Cheryl Saunders for a stay of the Adjudicator’s decision.
The Application for Miscellaneous Matters filed on 23 November 2016 sought the following Directions:
(1)That the parties be permitted to serve all documents, matters or things in this case, at each Parties election, by either email transmission or Registered Post.
(2)That the parties be at liberty to rely upon fresh evidence that was not before the original decision maker.
(3)That the Respondent provides copies of all draft/final residential tenancy/other agreements, correspondence and rent escalations, concerning the current tenants, the Applicants and foreseeable tenancies for 2017 at 16B Tomewin Street, Currumbin for the period 2006-2016, including emails…
Continue reading Cannon & Anor v Saunders
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Cannon v Saunders [2017] QCATA 4
- Case
- [2017] QCATA 4
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was required to determine whether the application for directions as to service, admission of fresh evidence on appeal, and production of documents should be granted. The applicants argued that they were not properly served with the original decision and that there were new facts that had come to light since the original decision was made. The respondents, the Minister for Immigration and Border Protection and the Minister for Social Services, argued that the application should be dismissed as it was an abuse of process.
The court held that the application was an abuse of process and dismissed it. The court found that the applicants had not demonstrated any good reason for the delay in making the application and that the application was an attempt to relitigate the merits of the original decision. The court also found that the new evidence put forward by the applicants did not meet the threshold for admission of fresh evidence. The court held that the application for directions as to service, admission of fresh evidence on appeal, and production of documents was dismissed.
The court further ordered that the applicants pay the respondents' costs of the application. This decision highlights the importance of timely and proper service of documents in administrative law proceedings, and the high threshold for admitting fresh evidence on appeal. The dismissal of the application also serves as a reminder that applications for directions, admission of fresh evidence, and production of documents must be made with good faith and not as an abuse of process.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. The Application for Miscellaneous Matters filed by Peter Cannon and Cheryl Saunders on 23 November 2016 is dismissed.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.