Cannavo v Allen

Case [2009] FMCA 1251


FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA

CANNAVO v ALLEN [2009] FMCA 1251
BANKRUPTCY – Application to set aside bankruptcy notice – whether bankruptcy notice a nullity where one copy of the notice not signed by creditor’s agent – whether defect could be cured under s.306 of the Bankruptcy Act.
Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth), s.25C
Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth), ss.40, 41, 306
Bankruptcy Regulations 1996 (Cth), regs.4.01, 4.02, 16.01
Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), s.1321
Federal Magistrates Court (Bankruptcy) Rules 2006 (Cth), r.3.02
Adams v Lambert (2006) 228 CLR 409; [2006] HCA 10
Chandramouli v Wallader [2001] FCA 808
Circle Credit Co-op Ltd v Lilikakis (2000) 99 FCR 592; [2000] FCA 667
Jensen v Queensland Law Society Inc (2006) 154 FCR 525; [2006] 1206
Kleinwort Benson Australia Limited v James Albert Crowl (1988) 165 CLR 71; [1998] HCA 34
Prudential-Bache Securities (Australia) Ltd v Warner [1999] FCA 1143
The Australian Steel Company (Operations) Pty Ltd v Lewis (2000) 109 FCR 33; [2000] FCA 1915
Trustees of the Franciscan Missionaries of Mary v Weir (2000) 98 FCR 447; [2000] FCA 574
Vaughan v Beretov [2006] FMCA 1294
Applicant: SEBASTIANO CANNAVO
Respondent: BRIAN HUGH ALLEN (LIQUIDATOR OF FLAMETIME PTY LTD)
File Number: SYG 2200 of 2009
Judgment of: Barnes FM
Hearing date: 7 December 2009
Delivered at: Sydney
Delivered on: 18 December 2009

REPRESENTATION

Counsel for the Applicant: Mr D Allen
Solicitors for the Respondent: V L Macri Lawyers Pty Limited
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr A Reoch
Solicitor for the Respondent: Mr J Dowling

ORDERS

  1. The application to set aside Bankruptcy Notice NN3658 of 2009 be dismissed. 

  2. The applicant pay the costs of the respondent as agreed and in the absence of agreement taxed in accordance with the Federal Court Rules. 

FEDERAL MAGISTRATES
COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT
SYDNEY

SYG 2200 of 2009

SEBASTIANO CANNAVO

Applicant

And

BRIAN HUGH ALLEN (LIQUIDATOR OF FLAMETIME PTY LTD)

Respondent

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

  1. On 9 September 2009 the applicant (Mr Cannavo) filed an application to set aside Bankruptcy Notice NN3658 of 2009 issued on 13 August 2009 and served on him on 19 August 2009. The bankruptcy notice was said to be based on two judgments/orders of the District Court of New South Wales of 28 July 2009 and interest thereon. It appeared from the accompanying affidavit of 9 September 2009 sworn by Mr Macri, the solicitor for the applicant, that the basis for the application was that Mr Cannavo had sought an extension of time to apply for a review of a costs assessment in circumstances where the debt relied on to found the bankruptcy notice was an order for costs in favour of the respondent made by the Supreme Court of New South Wales in proceedings between the respondent and the applicant. That costs order had been the subject of an assessment. It then formed the basis for the judgments entered against Mr Cannavo in the District Court of New South Wales in the total sum of $119,161.76. In addition,…

Continue reading Cannavo v Allen

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Cannavo v Allen [2009] FMCA 1251
Case
[2009] FMCA 1251
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Cannavo v Allen involved the applicant, Cannavo, and the respondent, Allen. The central issue was Cannavo's application to set aside a Bankruptcy Notice NN3658 of 2009 issued by Allen. The matter was heard in the Federal Court of Australia. The dispute centred on whether the Bankruptcy Notice was valid and if there were sufficient grounds for Cannavo to seek its annulment.

The court needed to determine the legitimacy of the Bankruptcy Notice and whether the applicant had grounds for its annulment. The primary legal issues revolved around the validity of the notice, the procedural fairness in issuing it, and the applicant's standing to challenge it. The court also examined whether there were any errors or irregularities in the process that warranted setting aside the notice.

In rendering its decision, the court examined the procedural correctness of the notice and the evidence presented by both parties. It found no procedural errors or irregularities that would invalidate the notice. The court also concluded that the applicant had not demonstrated any grounds warranting the annulment of the notice. Consequently, the court dismissed Cannavo's application to set aside the Bankruptcy Notice and ordered Cannavo to pay the costs of the respondent as agreed or, in the absence of agreement, taxed in accordance with the Federal Court Rules.

Orders

Orders of the court

1.

The application to set aside Bankruptcy Notice NN3658 of 2009 be dismissed.

2.

The applicant pay the costs of the respondent as agreed and in the absence of agreement taxed in accordance with the Federal Court Rules.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.