| [2017] FWCA 2370 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Caltex Refineries (Qld) Pty Ltd
(AG2017/973)
CALTEX REFINERIES (QLD) PTY LTD MECHANICAL MAINTENANCE ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2017
Oil and gas industry | |
COMMISSIONER ROE | MELBOURNE, 2 MAY 2017 |
Application for approval of the Caltex Refineries (Qld) Pty Ltd Mechanical Maintenance Enterprise Agreement 2017.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Caltex Refineries (Qld) Pty Ltd Mechanical Maintenance Enterprise Agreement 2017 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Caltex Refineries (QLD) Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. The Agreement does not cover all of the employees of the employer, however, taking into account the factors in Section 186(3) and (3A) I am satisfied that the group of employees was fairly chosen.
[3] The “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU) being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] The Agreement was approved on 2 May 2017 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 9 May 2017. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 25 November 2019.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code C, AE424182 PR592528>
- AGLC
- Caltex Refineries (Qld) Pty Ltd [2017] FWCA 2370
- Case
- [2017] FWCA 2370
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was required to determine if the agreement adequately provided for minimum terms and conditions, including rates of pay and conditions of employment. It also had to consider whether the agreement provided for procedural fairness and if it contained any provisions that were contrary to public policy. Additionally, the court had to assess whether the agreement had been negotiated in good faith and whether it was appropriate for the employees covered by the agreement.
The Fair Work Commission found that the proposed agreement was compliant with the Fair Work Act 2009 and met all the necessary criteria for approval. The agreement provided for minimum terms and conditions that were no less favourable than the applicable awards and included provisions for procedural fairness. The Commission was satisfied that the agreement had been negotiated in good faith and did not contain any provisions that were contrary to public policy. As a result, the Commission approved the Mechanical Maintenance Enterprise Agreement 2017.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.