| [2020] FWC 2962 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.318 - Application for an order relating to instruments covering new employer and transferring employees
Calstores Pty Ltd T/A Calstores
(AG2020/776)
Vehicle industry | |
COMMISSIONER HUNT | BRISBANE, 5 JUNE 2020 |
Application for an order relating to instruments covering new employer and transferring employees – Tripstar Investments Pty Ltd Collective Enterprise Agreement – application granted.
[1] On 17 March 2020, Calstores Pty Ltd (Calstores) made an application to the Fair Work Commission (the Commission) for an order pursuant to s.318 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) that the Tripstar Investments Pty Ltd Collective Enterprise Agreement (the Agreement) not cover Calstores Pty Ltd and transferring employees who would be covered by the Agreement by virtue of s.313(1)(a) of the Act.
[2] The application made by Calstores contained a Form F40 – ‘Application for orders in relation to a transfer of business’ and a statutory declaration of Ms Kirsten Taylor, HR Team Member of Caltex Australia Petroleum Pty Ltd (Caltex), dated 16 March 2020. It is noted that Calstores is a wholly owned subsidiary of Caltex.
[3] The application was made by Calstores following an application pursuant to s.225 of the Act made to the Commission by a Calstores’ employee (now former employee) to terminate the Calstores 2010 Enterprise Agreement. As such, Calstores has also sought that pursuant to s.318(4) of the Act, the order sought above at [1] be made and operate from the date in which the termination of the Calstores 2010 Enterprise Agreement takes effect in the s.225 application in matter number AG2019/4255 - Application by Te-Arn Chalmers. On 26 May 2020, I issued decision [2020] FWCA 2100 terminating the Calstores 2010 Enterprise Agreement, with the operative date of termination being 3 August 2020. Accordingly, from 3 August 2020, relevant employees of Calstores will be employed either under the Vehicle Manufacturing, Repair, Services and Retail Award 2010 (the Vehicle Award) or the General Retail Industry Award 2010 (the Retail Award).
Background
[4] Calstores has historically operated its fuel retailing business through a combination of Caltex-owned fuel sites, franchisee-operated fuel sites and licensee-operated fuel sites.
[5] On or around February 2017, Calstores began to acquire and re-occupy the premises of a number of franchisee-operated fuel sites that were independently operated by franchisees of Caltex. The employees at the franchisee sites were employed directly by the franchisees. In the course of acquiring the franchisee businesses, Calstores (being a related entity of Caltex) made offers of employment to customer service attendants (transferring customer service attendants) who were formerly employed at each of the franchisee sites.
[6] The transferring customer service attendants who choose to accept offers of employment with Calstores are to be engaged by Calstores as customer service attendants, and will be engaged to perform work which if the same, or very similar to, the work they were previously performing for the Caltex franchisee. Calstores understands that at the time of each respective acquisition, the employment of the transferring…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Calstores Pty Ltd T/A Calstores and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2020] FWC 2962
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court centred on the interpretation and application of the relevant provisions within the Tripstar Investments Pty Ltd Collective Enterprise Agreement. Specifically, the court needed to determine whether the agreement's provisions could be extended to cover the new employer and the transferring employees, ensuring continuity of employment terms and conditions.
The court carefully examined the terms of the agreement, considering the intent of the parties involved. It concluded that the provisions of the agreement could be extended to the new employer and the transferring employees. The reasoning was based on the principle of maintaining the integrity of the employment terms as agreed upon in the original collective agreement, to protect the rights and conditions of the employees during the transition to a new employer.
As a result of the court's decision, the application was granted. The order ensured that the terms and conditions of the Tripstar Investments Pty Ltd Collective Enterprise Agreement would apply to the new employer and the transferring employees, maintaining continuity and protecting the rights of the employees involved.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.