Callis and Callis

Case [2019] FamCA 750


FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA

CALLIS & CALLIS [2019] FamCA 750
FAMILY LAW – PROPERTY – Application to set aside or vary property Consent Orders pursuant to s 79A on the ground of miscarriage of justice – Where there is sufficient evidence to establish ground – Where father did not disclose his significant superannuation pension in the payment phase in the Application for Consent Orders – Where miscarriage of justice established – Where discussion of applicable principles – Where appropriate to exercise discretion to set aside Consent Orders.
Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) s 79A
Carron & Laninga [2019] FamCAFC 115
Clifton & Stuart (1990) 14 Fam LR 511
Gebert & Gebert  (1990) Fam LR 62
Gilbert v. The Estate of Gilbert (1990) FLC 92-125
In the marriage of Kokl [1981] FamCA 60; (1981) 7 Fam LR 591
Lane & Lane [2016] FamCAFC 53
Pearce & Pearce [2016] FamCAFC 14
Perrin & Perrin [2018] FamCAFC 122
Suiker & Suiker (1993) FLC 92-436
Waterman & Waterman [2017] FamCAFC 23
APPLICANT: Ms Callis
RESPONDENT: Mr Callis
FILE NUMBER: PAC 4029 of 2010
DATE DELIVERED: 17 October 2019
PLACE DELIVERED: Parramatta
PLACE HEARD: Parramatta
JUDGMENT OF: Foster J
HEARING DATE: 19 July 2019

REPRESENTATION

COUNSEL FOR THE APPLICANT: Ms Druitt
SOLICITOR FOR THE APPLICANT: Benetatos White Solicitors
COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT: Ms Eldershaw
SOLICITOR FOR THE RESPONDENT: Craddock Murray Neuman

Orders

  1. The Consent Orders made on 21 September 2010 be set aside.

Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry of the order in the Court’s records.

IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment by this Court under the pseudonym Callis &Callis has been approved by the Chief Justice pursuant to s 121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).

Note: This copy of the Court’s Reasons for Judgment may be subject to review to remedy minor typographical or grammatical errors (r 17.02A(b) of the Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth)), or to record a variation to the order pursuant to r 17.02 Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth).

FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT PARRAMATTA

FILE NUMBER: PAC 4029 of 2010

Ms Callis

Applicant

And

Mr Callis

Respondent

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

  1. The applicant wife in these proceedings seeks to set aside pursuant to s 79A of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) (“the Act”) property orders made by consent on 21 September 2010 as between herself and her former husband.

  2. These proceedings were commenced by the applicant wife in her Initiating Application filed 12 October 2018. In her Amended Initiating Application subsequently filed on 1 February 2019 the wife seeks that the subject orders be varied and property adjustment as between her and the husband including a superannuation splitting order and various other orders as to implementation and enforcement be made.

  3. The husband in his Amended Response filed 14 December 2018 to the wife’s application seeks orders that the wife’s application be dismissed and that she pay his costs.

  4. On 5 April 2019 the Court determined that the section 79A…

Continue reading Callis and Callis

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Callis and Callis [2019] FamCA 750
Case
[2019] FamCA 750
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The parties to this proceeding were Mr. and Mrs. Callis, and the dispute concerned an application to set aside Consent Orders made on 21 September 2010. The matter came before Foster J.

The central legal issue before the court was whether the Consent Orders of 21 September 2010 should be set aside.

Foster J determined that the Consent Orders should be set aside. The reasons for this decision are not detailed in the provided text.

The court ordered that the Consent Orders made on 21 September 2010 be set aside.

Orders

Orders of the court

1.

The Consent Orders made on 21 September 2010 be set aside.

Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry of the order in the Court’s records.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.