Callaghan v Consumer Claims Tribunals

[1998] HCATrans 264

IN THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Office of the Registry
  Sydney  No S132 of 1997

B e t w e e n -

LAWRENCE MICHAEL CALLAGHAN

Applicant

and

CONSUMER CLAIMS TRIBUNALS

First Respondent

CASTOR HOLDINGS PTY LTD trading as OZ-TECH TV VIDEO HI-FI SERVICES

Second Respondent

Application for special leave to appeal

GLEESON CJ
McHUGH  J

TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS

AT SYDNEY ON FRIDAY, 7 AUGUST 1998, AT 12.41 PM

Copyright in the High Court of Australia

GLEESON CJ:   In this matter the Court has been informed that the first respondent does not wish to be represented at the hearing of the application for special leave and will submit to any order of the Court save as to costs, and the Court has also been informed that neither the applicant nor the second respondent desires to make any oral submissions.

The Court is of the view that the application for special leave should be refused on the basis that there are no sufficient prospects of success of an appeal.  The application for special leave to appeal is refused.

AT 12.42 PM THE MATTER WAS CONCLUDED