C.S.R. and Sisley

Case [2007] FMCAfam 724


FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA

C.S.R. & SISLEY [2007] FMCAfam 724
CHILD SUPPORT – Enforcement – arrears – late payment penalties – costs.
Child Support (Registration and Collection) Act 1988 (Cth), ss.68, 104
Family Law Act 1975 (Cth), s.117
Federal Magistrates Court Rules 2001, Schedule 1
Hendy v Deputy Child Support Registrar (2001) 27 Fam LR 641; (2001) 164 FLR 236
Applicant: CHILD SUPPORT REGISTRAR
Respondent: MR SISLEY
File number: HBC 493 of 2007
Judgment of: Roberts FM
Hearing dates: 16 May & 13 July 2007
Date of last submission: 13 July 2007
Delivered at: Launceston
Delivered on: 13 July 2007 (Ex tempore)

REPRESENTATION

Counsel for the Applicant: Mr J Shears
Solicitors for the Applicant: Australian Government Solicitor
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr T McGuire
Solicitors for the Respondent: Temple-Smith Partners

ORDERS

  1. That within seven days the Respondent MR SISLEY pay to the Child Support Agency at Hobart the sum of $8,555.35 such to be credited towards his liability to pay child support for the child R born in 1989 up to 4 July 2007.

  2. That the Respondent pay the costs of the Applicant fixed in the sum of $3,075 within six months of today.

  3. That the Enforcement Summons issued 16 April 2007 is dismissed in so far as it relates to any arrears of child support.

  4. That the said Enforcement Summons in so far as it relates to late payment penalties is adjourned sine die with liberty to either party to restore the Application to the list upon application to the Registry.

IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment under the pseudonym C.S.R. & Sisley is approved pursuant to s.121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).

FEDERAL MAGISTRATES
COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT
LAUNCESTON

HBC 493 of 2007

CHILD SUPPORT REGISTRAR

Applicant

And

MR SISLEY

Respondent

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

Applications

  1. An Enforcement Summons was lodged with the court by the Child Support Registrar on 13 April 2007.  The respondent is Mr Sisley.  That Enforcement Summons was issued by the Registrar of the court on 16 April 2007, with a first return date in Devonport on 14 May 2007.  On that day it was set down for hearing in that Devonport sitting on 16 May 2007.

  2. On 16 May 2007 the matter was adjourned for further hearing in July.  It is not necessary for me to detail all of what transpired on 16 May 2007, but in essence the respondent challenged the delegation of an employee of the Child Support Agency.  It now appears to be clearly accepted that that employee had the appropriate delegations to do what she did.

  3. The Enforcement Summons alleged that the respondent was indebted to the Commonwealth for $7,964.11 by way of child support and $759.31 by way of late payment penalties as at 12 April 2007.  It is now said that the respondent owes child support in the sum of $8,555.35 and late payment penalties of $1,032.10 as at 4 July 2007. 

  4. The applicant is seeking enforcement of the child support…

Continue reading C.S.R. and Sisley

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
C.S.R. and Sisley [2007] FMCAfam 724
Case
[2007] FMCAfam 724
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the case of C.S.R. and Sisley, the matter was heard in the Family Court of Australia. The dispute concerned a child support matter between the Applicant, C.S.R., and the Respondent, Mr. Sisley. The child in question, R, was born in 1989, and the dispute primarily involved the calculation and payment of child support arrears and late payment penalties up until 4 July 2007.

The legal issues before the court involved the calculation and enforcement of child support obligations and penalties. The court was required to determine the amount of child support arrears owed by Mr. Sisley to the Child Support Agency at Hobart and whether the late payment penalties were applicable. Additionally, the court needed to address the enforcement of the child support obligations and penalties as per the Enforcement Summons issued on 16 April 2007.

In its reasoning, the court found that Mr. Sisley owed the Child Support Agency the sum of $8,555.35 as child support for the period up to 4 July 2007. The court dismissed the Enforcement Summons to the extent it related to child support arrears, as it deemed the arrears had been adequately addressed by the payment order. However, the court adjourned the Enforcement Summons in relation to late payment penalties sine die, allowing either party to restore the application to the list upon application to the Registry. The court also ordered Mr. Sisley to pay the Applicant's costs of $3,075 within six months.

The court's final orders required Mr. Sisley to pay the specified amount to the Child Support Agency within seven days, pay the Applicant's costs within six months, dismiss the Enforcement Summons related to child support arrears, and adjourn the Summons related to late payment penalties with the possibility of future restoration.

Orders

Orders of the court

1.

That within seven days the Respondent MR SISLEY pay to the Child Support Agency at Hobart the sum of $8,555.35 such to be credited towards his liability to pay child support for the child R born in 1989 up to 4 July 2007.

2.

That the Respondent pay the costs of the Applicant fixed in the sum of $3,075 within six months of today.

3.

That the Enforcement Summons issued 16 April 2007 is dismissed in so far as it relates to any arrears of child support.

4.

That the said Enforcement Summons in so far as it relates to late payment penalties is adjourned sine die with liberty to either party to restore the Application to the list upon application to the Registry.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.