C.S.

Case

[2020] FWC 3715

16 JULY 2020

No judgment structure available for this case.

[2020] FWC 3715
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.789FC - Application for an order to stop bullying

C.S.
(AB2020/393)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT CLANCY

MELBOURNE, 16 JULY 2020

Application for a FWC order to stop bullying.

[1] On 18 June 2020, C.S. made an application for an order to stop bullying under s.789FC of the Fair Work Act 2009.

[2] The application was incomplete and not accompanied by the required filing fee or a completed waiver application.

[3] Sections 789FC(3) and (4) of the Act deal with application fees and state as follows:

789FC Application for an FWC order to stop bullying

...

(3) The application must be accompanied by any fee prescribed by the regulations.

(4) The regulations may prescribe:

(a) a fee for making an application to the FWC under this section; and

(b) a method for indexing the fee; and

(c) the circumstances in which all or part of the fee may be waived or refunded.”

[4] The Fair Work Regulations 2009 prescribe a filing fee for stop bullying applications and Regulation 6.07A(7) provides as follows:

“If the FWC is satisfied that the person making an application will suffer serious hardship if the person is required to pay the fee, no fee is payable for making the application.”

[5] On 18 June 2020 the Commission telephoned C.S. and his nominated representative to discuss his incomplete application. The Commission’s records indicate that C.S. and his nominated representative sought time to decide on their next steps. Following the telephone call, the Commission issued a letter noting that the application was made without payment of the lodgment fee or fee waiver application. The letter noted that in the absence of any advice from C.S. within 7 days from the date of the letter, the application may be closed without further notice.

[6] On 25 June 2020, the Commission attempted to telephone C.S.’s nominated representative and left a voicemail message advising that a reminder letter would be issued. Shortly after this, a further letter was emailed to both C.S. and his nominated representative advising that if the lodgment fee or a fee waiver application was not made within 14 days, the application would be referred to the Panel Head for anti-bullying matters and that the Commission may decide to exercise its power under subsection 587(1)(a) of the Act to dismiss C.S.’s application without further notice to him.

[7] On 9 July 2020, the Commission made a final attempt to telephone C.S.’s nominated representative and left a voicemail message noting that the matter remained unpaid and that the matter would now be referred to a Commission Member for consideration.

[8] No further response has been received from C.S., payment or a few waiver application have not been provided, and no further action has been taken by him or on his behalf. In the circumstances, the incomplete application has not been served upon any apparent respondent parties.

[9] Section 587(1) of the Act provides:

587 Dismissing applications

(1) Without limiting when the FWC may dismiss an application, the FWC may dismiss an application if:

(a) the application is not made in accordance with this Act; or

(b) the application is frivolous or vexatious; or

(c) the application has no reasonable prospects of success.”

[10] In considering all the circumstances, I am satisfied that the relevant application form was not accompanied by the prescribed fee and the application has not been made in accordance with the Act. A non-compliant application is directly contemplated by s.587(1)(a) of the Act. I am satisfied that it is appropriate in all the circumstances to dismiss the purported application.

[11] Accordingly, the application is dismissed under s.587(1)(a) of the Act. Of course, should C.S. wish to file a new application that is made in accordance with the Act in the future, he is not precluded from doing so.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR721011>

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0