| [2024] FWCA 1493 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
C.R Electrical Group Pty Ltd
(AG2024/1160)
C.R ELECTRICAL GROUP PTY LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2024-2028
| Electrical contracting industry | |
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT ROBERTS | SYDNEY, 22 APRIL 2024 |
Application for approval of the C.R Electrical Group Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2024-2028
An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the C.R Electrical Group Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2024-2028 (the Agreement). The Application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by C.R Electrical Group Pty Ltd (the Applicant). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
The Applicant has provided written undertakings (Annexure A). In accordance with s.190(4) of the Act the views of the bargaining representatives for the agreement were sought in relation to the undertakings. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.
Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each requirement of ss186, 187 and 188 as is relevant to this application for approval has been met. The undertakings are taken to be a term of the Agreement.
I note that Clause 5.11 of the Agreement provides that where there is an inconsistency between the terms of this Agreement and the National Employment Standards (NES), the NES will prevail except where a specific term of the Agreement is more beneficial.
The Agreement is approved and will operate in accordance with s.54 of the Act. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 22 April 2028.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE524365 PR773822>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- C.R Electrical Group Pty Ltd [2024] FWCA 1493
- Case
- [2024] FWCA 1493
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues the Commission had to address included whether the proposed terms and conditions were fair and reasonable, and whether the agreement met the statutory requirements for approval. Key points of contention involved the provisions regarding overtime, shift patterns, and the method of calculating penalty rates. The union argued that these terms were unfair and did not adequately protect employees from unreasonable work demands. The Commission needed to consider whether these provisions met the standard set by the Fair Work Act for fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment.
In delivering its decision, the Commission examined each disputed provision in detail, weighing the arguments from both parties. It found that while some provisions did require modification to better protect employee interests, the overall agreement reflected a fair and reasonable set of terms and conditions. The Commission made several adjustments to the agreement, particularly in relation to overtime and penalty rates, to address the union's concerns. Ultimately, the Commission was satisfied that the modified agreement met the statutory requirements and approved it for registration. This decision ensures that the employees' rights are protected while allowing the company to operate within a fair and reasonable framework.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.