C and C

Case [2003] FMCAfam 145


FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA

C & C [2003] FMCAfam 145
FAMILY LAW – Property – extent of property – outstanding professional fees – whether domestic violence should affect contribution – whether adjustment should be made for needs.

Family Law Act 1975

Kennon v Kennon (1997) FLC 92-757
Doherty v Doherty (1996) FLC 92-652
JEL v DDF (2001) FLC 93-075

Applicant: M E C
Respondent: R I C
File No: ZM 6438 of 2001
Delivered on: 9 May 2003
Delivered at: Melbourne
Hearing Dates: 25 & 26 July, 13 August 2002
Judgment of: Phipps FM

REPRESENTATION

Counsel for the Applicant: Mr P M O'Shannessy
Solicitors for the Applicant: Fleming Muntz
Counsel for the Respondent:

In person on 25 & 26 July 2002

Mr Devries on 13 August 2002

Solicitors for the Respondent: Kempson and Co.

ORDERS

  1. THAT the Husband and the Wife do all such acts and things and sign all such documents as may be required to sell all their right, title and interest in the real property and the water license relating to the property known as “S” in accordance with paragraph 3 of the Order made 19 February 2002.

  2. THAT upon completion of the sale, the proceeds of the sale be applied:

    (i)First, to pay all costs, commissions and expenses of the sale;

    (ii)Second, to discharge the mortgage and any other income payments affecting the real property;

    (iii)Third, 55 per cent of the balance then remaining be paid to the Wife;

    (iv)Fourth, from the balance then remaining, the sum of $12,307.70 to the Wife;

    (v)Fifth, the balance then remaining to the Husband.

  3. THAT if not already sold, the parties do all such acts and things and sign all such documents as required to sell all shares held by the parties including but not limited to the NRMA shares, R G shares and W B shares as required by paragraph 5 of the Order made 19 February 2002 and that the proceeds be paid into the parties B B joint account number 116341108.

  4. THAT the B B account be divided 55 per cent to the Wife and 45 per cent to the Husband.

  5. THAT the Husband indemnify the Wife in relation to all income taxation and goods and services tax in respect of the Husband’s valuation business and any profit or income from the parties farming business.

  6. THAT if found, the following shall remain the property of the Husband:

    (i)the Husband’s gold medal and clasp;

    (ii)the Husband’s calling collections;

    (iii)the Husband’s gold necklace and chain.

  7. THAT otherwise, each party be solely entitled to the exclusion of the other to all property (including choses in action) in the possession of such party at the date of these Orders.

  8. THAT the Husband be liable for and indemnify the Wife against all payments in respect of the loan for the motorcar which he drives and retains pursuant to these Orders.

  9. THAT each party forgoes any claim they may have to superannuation benefits belonging to or earned by the other.

  10. THAT insurance…

Continue reading C and C

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
C and C [2003] FMCAfam 145
Case
[2003] FMCAfam 145
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Family Court of Australia, the case of C and C involved a dispute between a husband and wife regarding the division of their assets following their divorce. The primary focus of the litigation was the distribution of their property, including real estate, shares, and personal belongings, as well as the allocation of liabilities and financial responsibilities. The court was tasked with determining how to fairly divide the assets and liabilities of the couple in accordance with the Family Law Act.

The legal issues before the court included the interpretation of the principles of "just and equitable" division of property, as well as specific issues regarding the valuation of the parties' assets and the allocation of liabilities. The court had to consider the respective contributions of each party to the marriage, both financial and non-financial, as well as future needs and circumstances. Additionally, the court needed to decide on the method of payment of certain debts and the distribution of specific items of personal property.

In delivering its judgment, the court found that the distribution of the assets should be conducted in a manner that was just and equitable, taking into account the principles of fairness and equality. The court ordered the sale of the jointly owned property and the division of the proceeds in a specified manner, ensuring that certain debts and costs were paid first. The court also mandated the division of shares and the payment of specific amounts to each party. Furthermore, the court ruled on the allocation of personal property, the indemnification of tax liabilities, and the responsibility for certain debts. The court's decision provided clear instructions for the execution of the property settlement and the division of liabilities, ensuring that the outcome was fair and just for both parties.

Orders

Orders of the court

1.

THAT the Husband and the Wife do all such acts and things and sign all such documents as may be required to sell all their right, title and interest in the real property and the water license relating to the property known as “S” in accordance with paragraph 3 of the Order made 19 February 2002.

2.

THAT upon completion of the sale, the proceeds of the sale be applied:

(i) First, to pay all costs, commissions and expenses of the sale;

(ii) Second, to discharge the mortgage and any other income payments affecting the real property;

(iii) Third, 55 per cent of the balance then remaining be paid to the Wife;

(iv) Fourth, from the balance then remaining, the sum of $12,307.70 to the Wife;

(v) Fifth, the balance then remaining to the Husband.

3.

THAT if not already sold, the parties do all such acts and things and sign all such documents as required to sell all shares held by the parties including but not limited to the NRMA shares, R G shares and W B shares as required by paragraph 5 of the Order made 19 February 2002 and that the proceeds be paid into the parties B B joint account number 116341108.

4.

THAT the B B account be divided 55 per cent to the Wife and 45 per cent to the Husband.

5.

THAT the Husband indemnify the Wife in relation to all income taxation and goods and services tax in respect of the Husband’s valuation business and any profit or income from the parties farming business.

6.

THAT if found, the following shall remain the property of the Husband:

(i) the Husband’s gold medal and clasp;

(ii) the Husband’s calling collections;

(iii) the Husband’s gold necklace and chain.

7.

THAT otherwise, each party be solely entitled to the exclusion of the other to all property (including choses in action) in the possession of such party at the date of these Orders.

8.

THAT the Husband be liable for and indemnify the Wife against all payments in respect of the loan for the motorcar which he drives and retains pursuant to these Orders.

9.

THAT each party forgoes any claim they may have to superannuation benefits belonging to or earned by the other.

10.

THAT insurance policies remain the sole property of the owner named therein.

11.

Otherwise the application is dismissed and removed from the Pending Cases List.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.