Bustos (Migration) [2021] AATA 1133 (23 February 2021)
DECISION RECORD
DIVISION:Migration & Refugee Division
APPLICANT: Mr Edgardo Nicolas Bustos
CASE NUMBER: 1818911
HOME AFFAIRS REFERENCE(S): BCC2018/1129465
MEMBER:Antonio Dronjic
DATE:23 February 2021
PLACE OF DECISION: Melbourne
DECISION:The Tribunal remits the application for a Skilled (Provisional) (Class VC) visa for reconsideration, with the direction that the applicant meets the following criteria for a Subclass 485 visa:
·cl.485.221 of Schedule 2 to the Regulations; and
·cl.485.222 of Schedule 2 to the Regulations.
Statement made on 23 February 2021 at 4:48pm
CATCHWORDS
MIGRATION – Skilled (Provisional) (Class VC) visa – Subclass 485 (Graduate Work) – occupation of Painting Trades Worker – Australian study requirement – two academic years of relevant study – courses closely related to the nominated skilled occupation – decision under review remitted
LEGISLATION
Education Services for Overseas Students Act 2000
Migration Act 1958, ss 65, 360
Migration Regulations 1994, Schedule 2, cls 485.221, 485.222; r 1.15CASES
Alimi v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2007] FMCA 1520
Chawdhury v MIAC [2010] FMCA 275
Chow v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCA 1429
Constantino v MIBP [2013] FCA 1301
Durzi v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2006] FCA 1767
Kabir v MIAC [2010] FMCA 577
Lobo v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 168
MIBP v Dhillon 2014) 227 FCR 525
Moller v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2007] FMCA 168
Sakhno v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2007] FMCA 1492
Shafiuzzaman v MIAC [2011] FMCA 874
Talha v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCAFC 115
Uddin v MIAC [2010] FCA 1281
Visnumolakala v Minister for Immigration [2006] FMCA 1209STATEMENT OF DECISION AND REASONS
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW
This is an application for review of a decision made by a delegate of the Minister for Home Affairs on 20 June 2018 to refuse to grant the applicant a Skilled (Provisional) (Class VC) visa under s.65 of the Migration Act 1958 (the Act).
The applicant applied for the visa on 9 March 2018. Visa Class VC contains Subclass 485. (For visa applications made before 1 July 2013, there is also a Subclass 487, however that subclass is not relevant to the present matter.) The criteria for the grant of a Subclass 485 visa are set out in Part 485 of Schedule 2 to the Migration Regulations 1994 (the Regulations). The primary criteria must be satisfied by at least one applicant. Other members of the family unit, if any, who are applicants for the visa need satisfy only the secondary criteria.
The delegate refused to grant the visa because the applicant did not satisfy cl.485.222 of Schedule 2 to the Regulations because the delegate was not satisfied that the qualification used to satisfy the Australian study requirement, a Certificate IV of Building and Construction (Building), is closely related to the applicant’s nominated occupation of Painting Trades Worker ANZSCO 332211.
The applicant sought review of the delegate’s decision…
Continue reading Bustos (Migration)
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Bustos (Migration) [2021] AATA 1133
- Case
- [2021] AATA 1133
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Tribunal was required to determine if the applicant met the criteria for the Subclass 485 visa, specifically focusing on the 'Australian study requirement' and the 'closely related' nature of their qualifications to the nominated occupation. The Australian study requirement, as defined by regulation 1.15F(1), necessitates the completion of registered courses totalling at least two academic years of study, undertaken in Australia while holding a study-authorised visa, with all instruction in English. An academic year is defined as at least 46 weeks.
The Tribunal found that the applicant's Certificate IV of Building and Construction (Building), completed in December 2017, did not, on its own, satisfy the requirement of at least two academic years (92 weeks) of study. However, upon considering further material, including a Statement of Academic Completion for a Certificate III in Painting and Decorating, the Tribunal concluded that the applicant did meet both the Australian study requirement under cl.485.221 and the requirement that their qualifications be closely related to the nominated occupation under cl.485.222. Consequently, the Tribunal remitted the visa application to the Minister for reconsideration, with a direction that the applicant had met these specified criteria.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Decision
Reasons for decision
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.