Buslines Group Pty Ltd

Case [2016] FWCA 1585


[2016] FWCA 1585

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Buslines Group Pty Ltd T/A Griffith Buslines
(AG2016/377)

BUSLINES GROUP BUS DRIVERS (GRIFFITH) ENTERPRISE

AGREEMENT 2015

Passenger vehicle transport (non rail) industry

DEPUTY PRESIDENT BULL SYDNEY, 15 MARCH 2016
Buslines Group Bus Drivers (Griffith) Enterprise Agreement 2015

[1]        An application has been made by Buslines Group Pty Ltd (the applicant) for the

approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Buslines Group Bus Drivers (Griffith)

Enterprise Agreement 2015 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of

the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) and is a single enterprise agreement.

[2]        The Agreement covers employees engaged by the employer engaged as passenger

vehicle drivers within the applicant’s Griffith depot. As per s.186(3) of the Act, I am satisfied

that the group of employees covered by the Agreement was fairly chosen based on the

operational and geographical distinction of the employees.

Better Off Overall Test

[3]        The Passenger Vehicle Transportation Award 2010 (the Award) is the relevant

reference instrument with respect to the better off overall test (BOOT) as required under s.186

of the Act. The rates of pay under the Agreement are significantly higher than the

corresponding minimum rates of pay under the Award, and the overtime provisions under the

1

Agreement are greater than the Award .
Approval

[4]        Taking into account the greater entitlements conferred under the Agreement when

compared to the Award, I am satisfied that the Agreement results in employees being better

off under the Agreement.
[2016] FWCA 1585

[5]        I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are

relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[6]        The Agreement is approved. In accordance with s.54(1), the Agreement will operate

from 22 March 2016. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2019.

1

Overtime penalties are applicable after 2 hours of overtime under the Agreement compared to being applicable after 3

hours of overtime under the Award

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code A, AE418196 PR577939>

Details
AGLC
Buslines Group Pty Ltd [2016] FWCA 1585
Case
[2016] FWCA 1585
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The matter before the court involved an application by Buslines Group Pty Ltd for the approval of an enterprise agreement, specifically the Buslines Group Bus Drivers (Griffith) Enterprise Agreement 2015. The applicant sought approval under section 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009. The agreement in question pertains to employees of the applicant who are engaged as passenger vehicle drivers within the Griffith depot. The court was required to determine whether the agreement met the criteria for approval under the Act, including whether it complied with the better off overall test (BOOT) and whether it was fairly chosen.

The court considered whether the agreement was fairly chosen and if it met the BOOT. The court found that the group of employees was fairly chosen based on the operational and geographical distinction. Regarding the BOOT, the court compared the rates of pay and overtime provisions in the agreement to those in the relevant award, the Passenger Vehicle Transportation Award 2010. The court noted that the agreement provided significantly higher rates of pay and more favourable overtime provisions than the award, thereby satisfying the BOOT. The court concluded that the agreement resulted in employees being better off overall.

Having satisfied itself that all relevant requirements of the Fair Work Act were met, the court approved the Buslines Group Bus Drivers (Griffith) Enterprise Agreement 2015. The agreement was set to operate from 22 March 2016, with a nominal expiry date of 30 June 2019. The court's approval was based on the findings that the agreement was fairly chosen and met the better off overall test, among other statutory requirements.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.