Buslines Group Pty Ltd

Case [2016] FWCA 2691


[2016] FWCA 2691

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Buslines Group Pty Ltd T/A Picton Buslines
(AG2016/645)

PICTON BUSLINES PTY LIMITED- A MEMBER OF BUSLINES

GROUP- BUS DRIVERS ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2015

Passenger vehicle transport (non rail) industry

DEPUTY PRESIDENT BULL SYDNEY, 4 MAY 2016

Application for approval of the Picton Buslines Pty Limited -a Member of Buslines Group -

Bus Drivers Enterprise Agreement 2015.

[1]        An application has been made by Buslines Group Pty Limited (the applicant) for the

approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Picton Buslines Pty Limited -a Member of

Buslines Group - Bus Drivers Enterprise Agreement 2015 (the Agreement). The application

was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The Agreement is a single

enterprise agreement.

[2]        The Agreement covers passenger vehicle drivers at the Picton depot. As per the

requirement under s.186(3) of the Act, I am satisfied that the group of employees to be

covered by the Agreement was fairly chosen.

[3]        The employer’s application form F16 indicates that there were no bargaining

representatives appointed for the negotiation of the Agreement.

Consultation Term

[4]        The consultation term at clause 26 of the Agreement does not meet the requirements of

s.205(1A) of the Act. The clause does not comprehensively address the requirements of

consultation as enunciated in the model term.

[5]        Pursuant to s.205(2) of the Act, the model consultation term at Schedule 2.3 of the

Fair Work Regulations 2009 will be taken to be a term of the Agreement. A copy of the

model consultation term is attached at Annexure A of this decision.

Undertaking
[2016] FWCA 2691

[6]        On its own initiative, the applicant has provided an undertaking which states that

annual leave loading on termination of employment will be paid on accordance with s.90 of

the Act. That undertaking is annexed at Annexure B.

Better off overall test

[7]        With respect to the better off overall test (BOOT) under s.186 of the Act, the terms

and conditions under the Agreement are more beneficial than the Passenger Vehicle

Transportation Award 2010, being the relevant reference instrument for the purposes of the

BOOT, including:

1.    Significantly higher base rates of pay for both casuals and permanent employees;

2.    Greater loadings on annual leave;

3. Increased penalty rates.

Conclusion

[8]        Taking into account the higher rates of pay and increased penalty rates under the

Agreement when compared to the Award, I am satisfied that the Agreement results in

employees being better off under the Agreement.

[9]        I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are

relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[10]      The Agreement is approved. In accordance with s.54(1), the Agreement will operate 7

days from approval. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2019.

[2016] FWCA 2691

[2016] FWCA 2691

[2016] FWCA 2691

[2016] FWCA 2691

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code G, AE418752 PR579691>

Details
AGLC
Buslines Group Pty Ltd [2016] FWCA 2691
Case
[2016] FWCA 2691
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the case of Buslines Group Pty Ltd, the Deputy President of the Fair Work Commission considered an application for the approval of a single-enterprise agreement, specifically the Picton Buslines Pty Limited - a Member of Buslines Group - Bus Drivers Enterprise Agreement 2015, under section 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009. The agreement covered passenger vehicle drivers at the Picton depot. The key issues for determination were whether the agreement met the requirements for approval, including the fair choice of the employee group, compliance with the model consultation term, and the better off overall test (BOOT) against the Passenger Vehicle Transportation Award 2010.

The Deputy President found that the group of employees to be covered by the agreement was fairly chosen, and there were no bargaining representatives appointed for the negotiation of the agreement. However, the consultation term at clause 26 of the agreement did not meet the requirements of section 205(1A) of the Act as it did not comprehensively address the requirements of consultation as per the model term. Consequently, the model consultation term at Schedule 2.3 of the Fair Work Regulations 2009 was deemed to be a term of the agreement. Additionally, the applicant provided an undertaking that annual leave loading on termination of employment would be paid in accordance with section 90 of the Act.

Regarding the BOOT, the Deputy President concluded that the terms and conditions under the agreement were more beneficial than the award, given the significantly higher base rates of pay, greater loadings on annual leave, and increased penalty rates. Therefore, the Deputy President was satisfied that the agreement resulted in employees being better off overall. All relevant requirements of sections 186, 187, and 188 of the Act were met, and the agreement was approved. The agreement will operate seven days from approval and will expire on 30 June 2019.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.