Burt and Merrill

Case [2018] FamCA 162


FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA

BURT & MERRILL [2018] FamCA 162
FAMILY LAW – PROPERTY – SPOUSAL MAINTENANCE – Interim – whether the wife has the capacity to continue the maintenance of the husband – Where consideration is given to the wife’s limited income – Where the wife does not have available income to make spousal maintenance payments – Consideration of whether wife could maintain husband from capital.

FAMILY LAW – PROPERTY – INTERIM DISTRIBUTION – Where the husband seeks monies be released to him for litigation funding –Where the litigation funding is to pursue further Applications – Consideration of Strahan & Strahan (Interim Property Orders) (2011) FLC 93-466 – Where the interests of the parties and the interests of justice would not be served by further interlocutory proceedings in relation to an interim distribution.

Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) ss 75(2), 79, 80(1)(h), 90SM, 117, 117(2A)

Harris and Harris (1993) FLC 92-378
Klearchos & Klearchos & Ors [2015] FamCAFC 217
Strahan & Strahan (Interim Property Orders) (2011) FLC 93-466
APPLICANT: Mr Burt
RESPONDENT: Ms Merrill
FILE NUMBER: MLC 9912 of 2013
DATE DELIVERED: 16 March 2018
PLACE DELIVERED: Adelaide
PLACE HEARD: Adelaide
JUDGMENT OF: Berman J
HEARING DATE: 1 March 2018

REPRESENTATION

COUNSEL FOR THE APPLICANT: Mr Walmsley QC
SOLICITOR FOR THE APPLICANT: Efron & Associates
COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT: Litigant in Person

SOLICITOR FOR THE RESPONDENT:

Orders

  1. That the Applications in a Case filed 21 September 2017 and 12 February 2018 be dismissed.

  2. That the wife do all things necessary to cause the total sum of FIFTY THREE THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED AND SIXTY THREE DOLLARS AND SIXTY FOUR CENTS ($53,563.64) to be forthwith withdrawn from funds held by her former solicitors in an investment trust account and disbursed as follows:-

    (a)To ASIC on behalf of KK Pty Ltd in the sum of NINE HUNDRED AND SIXTY FIVE DOLLARS ($965);

    (b)To ASIC on behalf of S Pty Ltd in the sum of SIX HUNDRED AND FORTY TWO DOLLARS ($642);

    (c)To State Government of Victoria for Land Tax in the sum of FIVE HUNDRED AND FORTY FIVE DOLLARS ($545);

    (d)To LL Water in relation to L Street, Suburb E in the sum of SEVEN HUNDRED AND ELEVEN DOLLARS AND EIGHTY FIVE CENTS ($711.85)

    (e)To the Child Support Agency for FF in the sum of TEN THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED AND THIRTY THREE DOLLARS ($10,733); and

    (f)To MM School for FF the sum of THIRTY NINE THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED AND SIXTY SIX DOLLARS AND SEVENTY NINE CENTS ($39,966.79).

  3. The balance of the Application in a Case filed 13 December 2017 is listed for hearing on 6 April 2018 at 9.30am (ACST) (2 hours allowed).

Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry of the order in the Court’s records.

IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment by this Court under the pseudonym Burt & Merrill has been approved by the Chief Justice pursuant to s 121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).

Note: This copy of the…

Continue reading Burt and Merrill

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Burt and Merrill [2018] FamCA 162
Case
[2018] FamCA 162
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the matter of *Burt and Merrill*, Berman J considered applications filed by the parties concerning financial matters. The dispute involved the disbursement of funds held by the wife's former solicitors.

The court was required to determine how certain funds held in trust should be distributed, specifically addressing payments to various government bodies, a utility provider, the Child Support Agency, and a school. The applications before the court sought orders for the disposition of these funds.

Berman J ordered that the applications filed on 21 September 2017 and 12 February 2018 be dismissed. The court further ordered the wife to cause the sum of $53,563.64 to be withdrawn from funds held by her former solicitors and disbursed to ASIC on behalf of KK Pty Ltd ($965) and S Pty Ltd ($642), the State Government of Victoria for Land Tax ($545), LL Water ($711.85), the Child Support Agency for FF ($10,733), and MM School for FF ($39,966.79). The remaining application filed on 13 December 2017 was listed for a further hearing.

Orders

Orders of the court

1.

That the Applications in a Case filed 21 September 2017 and 12 February 2018 be dismissed.

2.

That the wife do all things necessary to cause the total sum of FIFTY THREE THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED AND SIXTY THREE DOLLARS AND SIXTY FOUR CENTS ($53,563.64) to be forthwith withdrawn from funds held by her former solicitors in an investment trust account and disbursed as follows:-

(a) To ASIC on behalf of KK Pty Ltd in the sum of NINE HUNDRED AND SIXTY FIVE DOLLARS ($965);

(b) To ASIC on behalf of S Pty Ltd in the sum of SIX HUNDRED AND FORTY TWO DOLLARS ($642);

(c) To State Government of Victoria for Land Tax in the sum of FIVE HUNDRED AND FORTY FIVE DOLLARS ($545);

(d) To LL Water in relation to L Street, Suburb E in the sum of SEVEN HUNDRED AND ELEVEN DOLLARS AND EIGHTY FIVE CENTS ($711.85)

(e) To the Child Support Agency for FF in the sum of TEN THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED AND THIRTY THREE DOLLARS ($10,733); and

(f) To MM School for FF the sum of THIRTY NINE THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED AND SIXTY SIX DOLLARS AND SEVENTY NINE CENTS ($39,966.79).

3.

The balance of the Application in a Case filed 13 December 2017 is listed for hearing on 6 April 2018 at 9.30am (ACST) (2 hours allowed).

Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry of the order in the Court’s records.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.