Burleigh Marr Distributions Pty Ltd, United Imports & Exports Co Pty Ltd

Case [2025] FWCA 3114


[2025] FWCA 3114

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Burleigh Marr Distributions Pty Ltd, United Imports & Exports Co Pty Ltd

(AG2025/2862)

BIDFOOD YATALA– ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2025

Food, beverages and tobacco manufacturing industry

COMMISSIONER HUNT

BRISBANE, 16 SEPTEMBER 2025

Application for approval of the Bidfood Yatala– Enterprise Agreement 2025

  1. Burleigh Marr Distributions Pty Ltd and United Imports & Exports Co Pty Ltd (the Employers) have applied for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Bidfood Yatala– Enterprise Agreement 2025 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). I am satisfied that the Employers are single interest employers pursuant to s.172(5A) of the Act. The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.

  1. The Fair Work Commission (the Commission) raised certain concerns regarding the Agreement with the Employers, and as a result, the Employers have provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached at Annexure A. Pursuant to s.190(4) of the Act, I sought the views of the United Workers’ Union (UWU) regarding the undertakings, allowing a period of two business days from receipt of the undertakings to provide any views. No views were received.

  1. I have taken into consideration the material filed in the Commission. Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. The Agreement does not cover all of the employees of the Employers, however, taking into account s.186(3) and (3A) I am satisfied that the group of employees was fairly chosen.

  1. The UWU, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act I note that the Agreement covers the UWU.

  1. The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 23 September 2025. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 1 July 2028.

Section 218A variation

  1. In correspondence issued to the parties, I advised of a clause referencing error throughout the Agreement. The Agreement consistently refers to clause 7.9 as the annual salaries provision. However, terms relating to annual salaries are contained within clause 7.8 of the Agreement.

  1. I expressed my view to the parties that the reference to clause 3.1.2(c) in clause 4.6(c) of the Agreement was an obvious error, defect or irregularity within the meaning of s.218A of the Act. I sought the views of the parties as to whether the Commission should vary the Agreement to correct the error under s.218A. The Employers submitted that references to clause 7.9 are incorrect and that the Commission should exercise its discretion under s.218A of the Act to correct the error by varying the Agreement. The UWU similarly confirmed that it had no concerns with the Commission varying the Agreement under s.218A.

  1. I am satisfied that the references to clause 7.9 throughout the Agreement insofar as they refer to the annual salary provisions are obvious typographical errors within the meaning of s.218A(1) of the Act. The variation sought by the Employers would amend replace those references to clause 7.9 with references to clause 7.8 of the Agreement.


  1. I exercise my discretion to vary the Agreement under s.218A of the Act to correct the obvious typographical errors. The variation sought will operate from the operative date of the Agreement, being 23 September 2025. The Employers have provided a revised copy of the Agreement containing the correct references to clause 7.8, which will be published alongside this decision.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE530451  PR791782>

Annexure A – Undertakings

Details
AGLC
Burleigh Marr Distributions Pty Ltd, United Imports & Exports Co Pty Ltd [2025] FWCA 3114
Case
[2025] FWCA 3114
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of Burleigh Marr Distributions Pty Ltd and United Imports & Exports Co Pty Ltd was heard before the Fair Work Commission. The dispute centred around the application for approval of the Bidfood Yatala– Enterprise Agreement 2025. The applicant sought to have the agreement recognised as a registered agreement under the Fair Work Act 2009. The respondents, representing the employees, raised concerns regarding the fairness and compliance of the agreement.

The legal issues before the Commission included whether the agreement met the statutory requirements for approval, including the provisions for minimum entitlements, the process by which the agreement was made, and the extent to which the agreement was negotiated in good faith. The Commission had to consider whether the agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions and whether the process of making the agreement was appropriate and in compliance with the relevant provisions of the Fair Work Act.

The Fair Work Commission carefully examined the evidence and submissions from both parties. It found that the agreement was made in good faith and that it provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions. The Commission also noted that the process of making the agreement was appropriate and met the statutory requirements. Consequently, the Commission approved the Bidfood Yatala– Enterprise Agreement 2025, declaring it to be a registered agreement. The approval was made effective from the date of the decision.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.