Burden v Horlock

Case

[2009] WADC 200 (S)

22 DECEMBER 2009

No judgment structure available for this case.

BURDEN -v- HORLOCK & ANOR [2009] WADC 200 (S)
Last Update:  26/03/2010
BURDEN -v- HORLOCK & ANOR [2009] WADC 200 (S)
Jurisdiction: DISTRICT COURT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   Citation No: [2009] WADC 200 (S)
Case No: CIV:1381/2008   Heard: 26-28 AUGUST & 1 SEPTEMBER 2009
Coram: GOETZE DCJ   Delivered: 22/12/2009
Location: PERTH   Supplementary Decision: 15/02/2010
No of Pages: 3   Judgment Part: 1 of 1
Result: Judgment amended to $111,458.87
[Click here for Judgment in Adobe Acrobat Format ]
Parties: TERRI LYNNE BURDEN
NICHOLAS JAMES HORLOCK
PIGMY PTY LTD T/AS COMMERCIAL MARINE MAINTENANCE (ACN 110 185 370)

Catchwords: Amendment of judgment sum to account for variation of damages as previously agreed between the parties
Legislation: Nil

Case References: Nil



JURISDICTION : DISTRICT COURT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA

                  IN CIVIL
LOCATION : PERTH CITATION : BURDEN -v- HORLOCK & ANOR [2009] WADC 200 (S) CORAM : GOETZE DCJ HEARD : 26-28 AUGUST & 1 SEPTEMBER 2009 DELIVERED : 22 DECEMBER 2009

SUPPLEMENTARY
DECISION : 15 FEBRUARY 2010 FILE NO/S : CIV 1381 of 2008 BETWEEN : TERRI LYNNE BURDEN
                  Plaintiff

                  AND

                  NICHOLAS JAMES HORLOCK
                  First defendant

                  PIGMY PTY LTD T/AS COMMERCIAL MARINE MAINTENANCE (ACN 110 185 370)
                  Second defendant

Catchwords:

Amendment of judgment sum to account for variation of damages as previously agreed between the parties

(Page 2)

Legislation:

Nil

Result:

Judgment amended to $111,458.87

Representation:

Counsel:


    Plaintiff : No appearance
    First defendant : No appearance
    Second defendant : No appearance

Solicitors:

    Plaintiff : SRB Legal
    First defendant : DLA Phillips Fox
    Second defendant : DLA Phillips Fox


Case(s) referred to in judgment(s):

Nil


(Page 3)

1 GOETZE DCJ: I delivered judgment in this matter on 22 December 2009 on the basis that storage costs were agreed in the sum of $6008.54 with a deduction to be made for GST in the sum of $600.

2 Since delivery of that judgment, the parties have agreed that they should not have agreed to deduct the GST sum of $600.

3 It is accordingly necessary to amend the amount of the allowed claim to $95,092.54 plus interest at 6 per cent per annum from 9 February 2007 to 22 December 2009, thus making the final judgment the sum of $111,458.87.

4 The parties are to provide a minute of agreed orders in such terms.


 |   | 
Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

1

Statutory Material Cited

1

Burden v Horlock [2009] WADC 200