Bunyong (Migration)

[2020] AATA 5332

Bunyong (Migration) [2020] AATA 5332 (13 October 2020)

DECISION RECORD

DIVISION:Migration & Refugee Division

APPLICANT:  Ms Waraporn Bunyong

CASE NUMBER:  1814746

HOME AFFAIRS REFERENCE(S):          BCC2016/4314072

MEMBER:C. Packer

DATE:13 October 2020

PLACE OF DECISION:  Melbourne

DECISION:The Tribunal remits the application for an Employer Nomination (Permanent) (Class EN) visa for reconsideration, with the direction that the applicant meets the following criteria for a Subclass 186 (Employer Nomination Scheme) visa:

·cl.186.223(2) of Schedule 2 to the Regulations

Statement made on 13 October 2020 at 5:32pm

CATCHWORDS

MIGRATION – Employer Nomination (Permanent) (Class EN) visa – Subclass 186 (Employer Nomination Scheme) – Temporary Residence Transition stream – position of Massage Therapist – nomination approved upon review – decision under review remitted          

LEGISLATION

Migration Act 1958, s 65
Migration Regulations 1994, r 5.19; Schedule 2, cl 186.223

STATEMENT OF DECISION AND REASONS

APPLICATION FOR REVIEW

1. This is an application for review of a decision made by a delegate of the Minister for Home Affairs on 18 May 2018 to refuse to grant the applicant an Employer Nomination (Permanent) (Class EN) visa under s.65 of the Migration Act 1958 (the Act).

2. The applicant applied for the visa on 21 December 2016. At the time of application, Class EN contained one subclass: Subclass 186 (Employer Nomination Scheme). The criteria for the grant of a Subclass 186 visa are set out in Part 186 of Schedule 2 to the Migration Regulations 1994 (the Regulations). The primary criteria must be satisfied by at least one applicant. Other members of the family unit, if any, who are applicants for the visa need satisfy only the secondary criteria. Applicants seeking to satisfy the primary criteria must meet the ‘Common criteria’, as well as the criteria of one of three alternative visa streams: the Temporary Residence Transition stream, the Direct Entry stream, or the Labour Agreement stream.

3. In the present case, the first named applicant (the applicant) is seeking the visa in Temporary Residence Transition stream, to work in the nominated position of Massage Therapist 411611. The delegate refused to grant the visas because there was no approved business nomination.

4. For the following reasons, the Tribunal has concluded that the matter should be remitted for reconsideration.

   CONSIDERATION OF CLAIMS AND EVIDENCE

   Nomination of a position

5. Clause 186.223 as applicable in this case is set out in full in the attachment to this decision. Essentially, it requires that the position to which the application relates is the subject of an application for approval of a nomination in the Temporary Residence Transition stream that identifies the visa applicant. The position must be the one that was the subject of the declaration that was required to be made as part of the current visa application.

6. On 13 October 2020 in Tribunal case 1810215 the Tribunal found the nominator, Style Thai Beauty and Massage Pty Ltd, meets the requirements of r.5.19 for approval of the nomination of the position in Australia. The Tribunal set aside the delegate’s decision to refuse the nomination application under review and substituted a decision approving the nomination. Therefore, cl.186.223(2) is met. Given these findings, the appropriate course is to remit the visa application to the Minister to consider the remaining criteria for the visa.

   DECISION

7. The Tribunal remits the application for an Employer Nomination (Permanent) (Class EN) visa for reconsideration, with the direction that the applicant meets the following criteria for a Subclass 186 (Employer Nomination Scheme) visa:

   ·cl.186.223(2) of Schedule 2 to the Regulations

   C. Packer
   Member

   
   

   ATTACHMENT A

   186.223(1)     The position to which the application relates is the position:

   (a)nominated in an application for approval that seeks to meet the requirements of subregulation 5.19(3); and

   (b)in relation to which the applicant is identified as the holder of a Subclass 457 … visa; and

   (c)in relation to which the declaration mentioned in paragraph 1114B(3)(d) of Schedule 1 was made in the application for the grant of the visa.

   (2)     The Minister has approved the nomination.

   (3)     The nomination has not subsequently been withdrawn.

   (3A)    Either:

   (a)there is no adverse information known to Immigration about the person who made the nomination or a person associated with that person; or

   (b)it is reasonable to disregard any adverse information known to Immigration about the person who made the nomination or a person associated with that person.

   (4)     The position is still available to the applicant.

   (5)     The application for the visa is made no more than 6 months after the Minister approved the nomination.