Bunnings Group Limited T/A Bunnings Warehouse

Case

[2024] FWCA 3969

13 NOVEMBER 2024


[2024] FWCA 3969

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Bunnings Group Limited T/A Bunnings Warehouse

(AG2024/4066)

BUNNINGS AND CFMEU FRAME AND TRUSS HALLAM ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2024

Retail industry

COMMISSIONER ALLISON

MELBOURNE, 13 NOVEMBER 2024

Application for approval of the Bunnings and CFMEU Frame and Truss Hallam Enterprise Agreement 2024

  1. Bunnings Group Ltd (the Employer) has made an application, pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act), for approval of a single enterprise agreement known as the Bunnings and CFMEU Frame and Truss Hallam Enterprise Agreement 2024 (the Agreement).

  1. The Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.

  1. The agreement title on the Notice of Employee Representational Rights (NERR) that was issued to the employees was the “Bunnings Hallam Enterprise Agreement 2024” which does not match the title of the Agreement to be approved. The NERR was also not in the form prescribed by the regulations. I am satisfied that these were minor procedural or technical errors and that the employees were not likely to have been disadvantaged by them. Accordingly, I exercise the discretion conferred by s.188(5) of the Act to disregard these errors.

  1. The following provisions may be inconsistent with the National Employment Standards (NES):

  • Clause 8.9((b) of the Agreement, relating to notice requirements for personal and carer’s leave, may be a more stringent notice requirement than as provided in s.107(2)(a) of the Act.
  • Schedule B of the Agreement relating to evidentiary requirements for personal leave may provide a more burdensome standard of proof than required by s.107(3) of the Act.
  • Clause 8.1.3(d), relating to casual conversion, appears more restrictive than s.66F of the Act.
  1. However, noting clause 7 of the Agreement, I am satisfied the more beneficial entitlements of the NES will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES.

  1. Clause 16 of the Agreement does not provide for consultation in relation to changes to regular roster or ordinary hours of work. However, noting clause 6 of the Agreement, I am satisfied that the consultation term provision at clause 35 of the Timber Industry Award 2020 is incorporated into the Agreement.

  1. I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. The Agreement does not cover all of the employees of the employer, however, taking into account the factors in Section 186(3) and (3A) I am satisfied that the group of employees was fairly chosen.

  1. The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 25 November 2024, being the start of the first pay cycle after the approval of Agreement. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2026.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE526750  PR781232>

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0