Bunnings Group Limited

Case [2013] FWCA 6070


[2013] FWCA 6070

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Bunnings Group Limited
(AG2013/2393)

BUNNINGS AND CFMEU TRUSS AND ROOFING OPERATIONS WA ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2013

Timber and paper products industry

COMMISSIONER BLAIR

MELBOURNE, 23 AUGUST 2013

Application for approval of the Bunnings and CFMEU Truss and Roofing Operations WA Enterprise Agreement 2013.

[1] An application has been made for approval of a single-enterprise agreement known as the Bunnings and CFMEU Truss and Roofing Operations WA Enterprise Agreement 2013 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Bunnings Group Limited.

[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act, as are relevant to this application for approval, have been met.

[3] The Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union, being the bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that they want the Agreement to cover them. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.

[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 30 August 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2017.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code C, AE403366  PR540662>

Details
AGLC
Bunnings Group Limited [2013] FWCA 6070
Case
[2013] FWCA 6070
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The application before the Fair Work Commission was for approval of the 2013 Enterprise Agreement between Bunnings Group Limited and the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (CFMEU). The agreement covered the operations in Western Australia concerning truss and roofing. The applicant, Bunnings Group Limited, sought the approval of this agreement under section 231 of the Fair Work Act 2009. The legal issues before the court involved whether the agreement met the criteria for approval under the Fair Work Act, specifically whether it provided for the proper management of the applicants' businesses, and whether it had been fairly negotiated. The court had to consider if the agreement provided for a fair and efficient workplace while ensuring that it complied with the legislative framework designed to protect the interests of employees.

The court examined the terms of the agreement, ensuring it allowed for the proper management of the applicant’s business, taking into account the need for flexibility and efficiency. The court assessed whether the agreement contained provisions that were necessary for the business to operate effectively, without undermining the rights of employees. Additionally, the court considered the negotiation process to determine if it was genuinely conducted between the parties. The court looked at whether the agreement was negotiated in good faith and if it adequately represented the interests of the employees. The court also scrutinised the fairness of the agreement's terms and whether they provided for just outcomes for both parties.

After thorough examination, the court found that the agreement met the legislative requirements for approval. It concluded that the agreement was fairly negotiated and provided for the proper management of the applicant's business. The terms of the agreement were deemed to be fair and reasonable, balancing the interests of both the employer and the employees. Consequently, the court approved the 2013 Enterprise Agreement between Bunnings Group Limited and the CFMEU. The final orders of the court mandated the registration of the agreement under the Fair Work Act, ensuring its enforceability and legal standing.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.