Bujaroski v The Queen

Case

[2002] HCATrans 480

No judgment structure available for this case.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Office of the Registry
  Sydney  No S262 of 2001

B e t w e e n -

LUBE BUJAROSKI

Applicant

and

THE QUEEN

Respondent

Application for special leave to appeal

GLEESON CJ
CALLINAN J

TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS

AT SYDNEY ON FRIDAY, 15 NOVEMBER 2002, AT 11.32 AM

Copyright in the High Court of Australia

MR R.D. COGSWELL, SC:   May it please the Court, I appear for the respondent with my learned friend, MS J.A. QUILTER.  (instructed by S.E. O’Connor, Solicitor for Public Prosecutions) 

GLEESON CJ:   Yes, Mr Cogswell. 

MR COGSWELL:   I do not anticipate an appearance for the applicant. 

GLEESON CJ:   No.  We have been notified by the applicant that he will not be attending Court and does not want to put oral argument. 

In this matter we have considered the written argument advanced on behalf of the applicant.  The applicant has indicated that he will not be attending Court.  We have also, of course, considered the written arguments advanced on behalf of the respondent.  We have concluded that there are insufficient prospects of success of an appeal to warrant a grant of special leave and the application is refused. 

We will adjourn for a short time to reconstitute.

AT 11.33 AM THE MATTER WAS CONCLUDED

Areas of Law

  • Criminal Law

  • Evidence

Legal Concepts

  • Appeal

  • Charge

  • Sentencing

  • Expert Evidence

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0