Buckworth v Gladio Pty Ltd
Case
•
[2016] NSWCA 104
•11 May 2016
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Buckworth v Gladio Pty Ltd [2016] NSWCA 104
[2016] NSWCA 104
11 May 2016
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Buckworth (the applicant) sought a stay of execution of a primary judgment pending the determination of proceedings in the High Court. Gladio Pty Ltd (the first respondent) was the party against whom the primary judgment had been entered. The application for a stay was heard by Meagher JA.
The central legal issue before Meagher JA was whether the applicant had a substantial prospect of success in an application for special leave to appeal to the High Court. This required the court to assess the nature of the proposed appeal and its likelihood of being granted special leave.
Meagher JA reasoned that a stay of execution would only be granted if there was a substantial prospect of success in the special leave application. In this instance, the question to be raised in the High Court appeal was found to be one of fact, without general application, and did not raise any question of principle. Consequently, the prospects of obtaining special leave were not considered substantial.
Accordingly, the appellant/applicant’s notice of motion filed on 6 May 2016 was dismissed, and the applicant was ordered to pay the first respondent’s costs of the motion.
The central legal issue before Meagher JA was whether the applicant had a substantial prospect of success in an application for special leave to appeal to the High Court. This required the court to assess the nature of the proposed appeal and its likelihood of being granted special leave.
Meagher JA reasoned that a stay of execution would only be granted if there was a substantial prospect of success in the special leave application. In this instance, the question to be raised in the High Court appeal was found to be one of fact, without general application, and did not raise any question of principle. Consequently, the prospects of obtaining special leave were not considered substantial.
Accordingly, the appellant/applicant’s notice of motion filed on 6 May 2016 was dismissed, and the applicant was ordered to pay the first respondent’s costs of the motion.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Costs
-
Jurisdiction
-
Stay of Proceedings
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Fox v Big Country Developments Pty Ltd [2016] FCCA 2447
Cases Cited
3
Statutory Material Cited
0
Buckworth v Gladio Pty Ltd
[2016] NSWCA 54
Rinehart v Welker
[2012] NSWCA 1