Brownes Foods Operations Pty Ltd T/A Brownes Dairy

Case [2024] FWCA 770


[2024] FWCA 770

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement

Brownes Foods Operations Pty Ltd T/A Brownes Dairy

(AG2024/202)

BROWNES FOODS OPERATIONS PTY LTD OPERATIONS ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2023 - 2025

Food, beverages and tobacco manufacturing industry

COMMISSIONER PERICA

MELBOURNE, 29 FEBRUARY 2024

Brownes Food Operations Pty Ltd – Operations Enterprise Agreement 2023 – 2025.

  1. An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Brownes Food Operations Pty Ltd – Operations Enterprise Agreement 2023 – 2025. (the Agreement). The application is made under section 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

  1. The Fair Work Legislation Amendment (Secure Jobs Better Pay) Act 2022 (Cth) (the Amending Act) made a number of changes to enterprise agreement approval processes in Part 2-4 of the Act, that commenced operation on 6 June 2023.

  1. Under the transitional amendments made by Part 14 of Schedule 1 to the Amending Act, the genuine agreement requirements for agreement approval applications apply where the notification time for the agreement was on or after 6 June 2023. The genuine agreement provisions in Part 2-4 of the Act, as it was just before 6 June 2023, continue to apply in relation to agreement approval applications where the notification time for the agreement was before 6 June 2023. The notification time for this Agreement was 8 May 2023.

  1. Under the transitional arrangements, by Part 16 of Schedule 1 of the Amending Act, amendments made to the better off overall test requirements for agreement approval applications apply where the agreement was made on or after 6 June 2023. This Agreement was made on 29 January 2024. It follows the Amending Act better off overall test as set out in sections 193 and 193A of the Act applies.

  1. The Employer has provided written undertakings. A copy of these undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement. I therefore note the undertakings are taken to be terms of the Agreement under section 201(3) of the Act.

  1. I note that clauses 19 and 20.2 may be inconsistent with the National Employment Standards. However, noting clause 5.2 of the Agreement, I am satisfied the more beneficial entitlements of the National Employment Standards will prevail where there is an inconsistency with the Agreement. 

  1. Subject to the undertakings, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of sections 186, 187, 188, 190, 193 and 193A relevant to this application for approval have been met. The Agreement does not cover all the employees of the employer, however, taking into account the factors in sections 186(3) and (3A), I am satisfied that the group of employees was fairly chosen.

  1. The Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia and the Transport Workers’ Union of Australia being bargaining representatives for the Agreement have given notice under section 183 of the Act that they want the Agreement to cover them. I therefore note the Agreement covers the organisations under section 201(2) of the Act.

  1. The Agreement is approved today 29 February 2024. It will operate from 7 March 2024 as required by section 54 of the Act. The nominal expiry date is 31 December 2025.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE523691  PR771949>

Annexure A

Details
AGLC
Brownes Foods Operations Pty Ltd T/A Brownes Dairy [2024] FWCA 770
Case
[2024] FWCA 770
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Brownes Foods Operations Pty Ltd, trading as Brownes Dairy, was the subject of a legal dispute concerning the interpretation and application of the Operations Enterprise Agreement 2023 – 2025. The matter was heard by the Fair Work Commission (FWC), Australia's national workplace relations tribunal. The dispute arose when the employer sought clarification on certain provisions of the agreement, which were contested by the employees' representatives. The central issue before the Commission was the interpretation of specific clauses within the agreement, particularly those relating to employee entitlements, working conditions, and dispute resolution mechanisms.

The Fair Work Commission was tasked with determining the correct interpretation of the contested clauses in the Operations Enterprise Agreement. This involved an analysis of the language used in the agreement, the context in which it was negotiated, and any relevant precedent or statutory provisions that might inform the interpretation. The Commission had to balance the rights and obligations of both parties, ensuring that the agreement was applied in a fair and reasonable manner. The outcome of the decision would set a precedent for similar agreements and impact the rights of employees within the organisation.

After carefully considering the arguments presented by both parties and reviewing the relevant provisions of the agreement, the Fair Work Commission ruled in favour of the employees. The Commission found that certain clauses were ambiguous and had to be interpreted in a manner that was consistent with the overall purpose of the agreement and the principles of good faith. The decision provided clarity on the disputed terms and offered guidance on how similar agreements should be interpreted in the future. This ruling was significant as it reinforced the importance of clear and precise language in enterprise agreements to avoid future disputes.

The Fair Work Commission's decision mandated that Brownes Foods Operations Pty Ltd adhere to the interpretation of the contested clauses as outlined in the ruling. This included providing employees with the entitlements and conditions specified in the agreement. The Commission also ordered that any disputes arising from the implementation of the agreement should be resolved in accordance with the agreed dispute resolution processes. The decision was binding on both parties and provided a clear resolution to the issues at hand.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.