Brott v The Queen

[1992] HCATrans 335

..

...

,	..
•	;,~·~

IN THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Office of the Registry

Melbourne No M49 of 1987

B e t w e e n -

ISAAC ALEXANDER BROTT

Applicant

and

THE QUEEN

Respondent

For mention

MASON CJ
BRENNAN J

McHUGH J

Brott(2) 1 13/11/92

TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS

AT MELBOURNE ON FRIDAY, 13 NOVEMBER 1992, AT 9.32 AM

Copyright in the High Court of Australia

BRENNAN J:  When judgment was given in this matter, the

Court gave liberty to apply in respect of any

consequential orders. The appellant thereafter

applied for further orders, to which the

respondent consented.	The Court makes an order in
the terms following:

Pursuant to the liberty to apply reserved to

the parties by the Order of 25 February 1992,
order -

1.        by consent that the matter be remitted to the

Court of Criminal Appeal of Victoria so that

the appeal to that Court against the

appellant's conviction for uttering be heard

and determined by the Court in accordance with

the judgment of this Court to the extent that

that judgment is relevant;

2.       that, to the extent, if any, that any matter

arising under s.14C of the Appeal Costs Act

1964 (Vic.) with respect to the costs of the

appeal to the Court of Criminal Appeal of

Victoria may be or may require to be remitted

to that Court, the matter be remitted to that

Court.

AT 9.34 AM THE MATTER WAS ADJOURNED SINE DIE

Brott(2) 2 13/11/92