Brooks Marchant Industries (ACT) Pty Ltd

Case

[2016] FWCA 5082

28 JULY 2016

No judgment structure available for this case.

[2016] FWCA 5082
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Brooks Marchant Industries (ACT) Pty Ltd
(AG2016/3679)

BROOKS MARCHANT INDUSTRIES (ACT) PTY LTD SINGLE ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2016

Electrical contracting industry

COMMISSIONER ROE

MELBOURNE, 28 JULY 2016

Brooks MARCHANT INDUSTRIES (ACT) Pty Ltd Single Enterprise Agreement 2016.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the BROOKS MARCHANT INDUSTRIES (ACT) Pty Ltd Single Enterprise Agreement 2016 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Brooks Marchant Industries (ACT) Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. The Agreement does not cover all of the employees of the employer, however, taking into account the factors in Section 186(3) and (3A) I am satisfied that the group of employees was fairly chosen.

[3] Pursuant to s.205(2) of the Act, the model consultation term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.

[4] The Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.

[5] The Agreement was approved on 28 July 2016 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 4 August 2016. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 28 July 2019.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code G, AE420140  PR583377>

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0