FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Brogden & Brogden [2021] FamCA 642
File number(s): SYC 2521 of 2019 Judgment of: HARPER J Date of judgment: 23 August 2021 Catchwords: FAMILY LAW – PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – COVID-19 –Adjournment of final hearing – In circumstances where the State of New South Wales is in lockdown – Where children would be present whilst trial occurs electronically and mother would have to give evidence – Where possibility of a face-to-face hearing is more likely in the coming months – Where there are allegations of family violence against the father – Electronic hearing may be deficient in assessing father’s character – Matter adjourned Number of paragraphs: 9 Date of hearing: 23 August 2021 Place: Sydney Counsel for the Applicant: Mr Givney Solicitor for the Applicant: McGrath Dicembre & Company Counsel for the Respondent: Mr Jackson Solicitor for the Respondent: Rivera Legal Solicitor for the Independent Children's Lawyer: Ark Law ORDERS
SYC 2521 of 2019 BETWEEN: MS BROGDEN
Applicant
AND: MR BROGDEN
Respondent
INDEPENDENT CHILDREN'S LAWYER
ORDER MADE BY:
HARPER J
DATE OF ORDER:
23 AUGUST 2021
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1.The final hearing listed to commence on 6 September 2021 be vacated.
2.The proceedings be adjourned to 17 January 2022 for final hearing, with an estimated hearing time of 5 days.
3.Leave be granted to the parties to file and serve any further affidavit material updating their consolidated trial affidavits by no later than close of registry filing on 17 December 2021.
4.By no later than 7 January 2022, the parties confer with the ICL for the purpose of agreeing a process to provide the single expert witness, Dr J, with any further material that the parties and ICL wish Dr J to consider prior to the hearing commencing on 17 January 2022.
5.The parties confer and submit to my chambers an agreed trial plan by no later than close of registry filing on 13 January 2022.
6.Leave be granted for the parties to issue up to two further subpoenas each.
Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry in the Court’s records.
Note: This copy of the Court’s Reasons for judgment may be subject to review to remedy minor typographical or grammatical errors (r 17.02A(b) of the Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth)), or to record a variation to the order pursuant to r 17.02 Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth).
IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment by this Court under the pseudonym Brogden & Brogden has been approved by the Chief Justice pursuant to s 121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).
EX TEMPORE REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
HARPER J
These proceedings are currently listed for final hearing commencing on 6 September 2021, with an estimated hearing time of five days. The parties have undertaken preparation for the final hearing, however, by reason of the COVID-19 pandemic, the court has raised with the parties the difficulties of conducting the trial appropriately via Microsoft Teams.
The father’s position is…
Continue reading Brogden & Brogden
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Brogden & Brogden [2021] FamCA 642
- Case
- [2021] FamCA 642
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the court was whether to grant an adjournment of the final hearing due to the State of New South Wales being in lockdown as a result of COVID-19. The court was required to consider the implications of conducting the trial electronically, particularly given that children would be present during the electronic trial and the mother would have to give evidence. The court also had to assess the potential impact of an electronic hearing on its ability to assess allegations of family violence against the father and the character of the father.
Harper J reasoned that an electronic hearing might be deficient in assessing the father's character, especially in light of the allegations of family violence. The court also considered that there was a possibility of a face-to-face hearing becoming available in the coming months. Consequently, the court determined that an adjournment was appropriate to ensure a fair and thorough hearing.
The court ordered that the final hearing listed for 6 September 2021 be vacated and the proceedings be adjourned to 17 January 2022 for a final hearing estimated to take 5 days. Leave was granted for parties to file updated affidavit material by 17 December 2021 and to confer with the Independent Children's Lawyer regarding the provision of further material to a single expert witness. The parties were also ordered to confer and submit an agreed trial plan by 13 January 2022, and leave was granted for each party to issue up to two further subpoenas.
Orders
Orders of the court
SYC 2521 of 2019
BETWEEN:
MS BROGDEN
Applicant
AND:
MR BROGDEN
Respondent
INDEPENDENT CHILDREN'S LAWYER
ORDER MADE BY:
HARPER J
DATE OF ORDER:
23 AUGUST 2021
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The final hearing listed to commence on 6 September 2021 be vacated.
2. The proceedings be adjourned to 17 January 2022 for final hearing, with an estimated hearing time of 5 days.
3. Leave be granted to the parties to file and serve any further affidavit material updating their consolidated trial affidavits by no later than close of registry filing on 17 December 2021.
4. By no later than 7 January 2022, the parties confer with the ICL for the purpose of agreeing a process to provide the single expert witness, Dr J, with any further material that the parties and ICL wish Dr J to consider prior to the hearing commencing on 17 January 2022.
5. The parties confer and submit to my chambers an agreed trial plan by no later than close of registry filing on 13 January 2022.
6. Leave be granted for the parties to issue up to two further subpoenas each.
Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry in the Court’s records.
Note: This copy of the Court’s Reasons for judgment may be subject to review to remedy minor typographical or grammatical errors (r 17.02A(b) of the Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth)), or to record a variation to the order pursuant to r 17.02 Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth).
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.