| [2017] FWCA 237 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Broadspectrum (Australia) Pty Ltd
(AG2016/7370)
BROADSPECTRUM (AIRTRAIN CUSTOMER SERVICE) ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2016 - 2018
Rail industry | |
COMMISSIONER ROE | MELBOURNE, 13 JANUARY 2017 |
Application for approval of the Broadspectrum (Airtrain Customer Service) Enterprise Agreement 2016 - 2018.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Broadspectrum (Airtrain Customer Service) Enterprise Agreement 2016 - 2018 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Broadspectrum (Australia) Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. The Agreement does not cover all of the employees of the employer, however, taking into account the factors in Section 186(3) and (3A) I am satisfied that the group of employees was fairly chosen.
[3] The Agreement was approved on 13 January 2017 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 20 January 2017. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2018.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE422990 PR589323>
- AGLC
- Broadspectrum (Australia) Pty Ltd [2017] FWCA 237
- Case
- [2017] FWCA 237
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the commission was whether the enterprise agreement complied with the statutory requirements outlined in the Fair Work Act and was made in good faith. The commission had to consider whether the agreement contained all the mandated provisions, whether it had been genuinely negotiated, and whether any terms unfairly disadvantaged employees. The commission also needed to assess the parties' conduct during the negotiation process.
The commission found that the enterprise agreement met all the necessary statutory requirements and had been made in good faith. The agreement contained all the mandated provisions, and the negotiation process was genuine. The commission also concluded that no term of the agreement unfairly disadvantaged employees. Therefore, the application for approval of the enterprise agreement was successful. The commission approved the agreement, ensuring that it would be legally binding for the duration of its term.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.