The application was opposed by Edgar Naunton Davies on the ground, among others, that the invention SO far as claims Nos. I and 5 were concerned had been patented by him in the Common- wealth on an application of prior date. The specification of the opponent's invention, which was called "an improvement in the internal construction of inferential turbine water meters," was as follows SO far as it is material :-
'In inferential turbine water meters as usually constructed the spindle is connected or attached to the lower part of the drum or runner by soldering or sweating. When a meter SO constructed is used in localities where the water is acidulated it is found that the jointing material is likely to be destroyed by chemical or galvanic action, and, the spindle becoming loose, the meter is rendered useless.
The object of this invention is to provide a method of attach- ing the spindle to the drum which will obviate the use of solder, spelter or other jointing material, the contact being entirely metallic throughout.
With this object in view I form on the inner face of the lower portion of the drum an upwardly projecting annular bead, within the inner circle of which the flared end or flange of the spindle is deposited. The bead is then closed on the edge of the flange by means of suitable dies and the joint is made.
The drum portion is stamped or pressed out in the usual way by dies and the latter are cut to form the bead at the one operation. The edge of the flange of the spindle may be made of chisel form, have a recess on the upper side, or have any suitable configura- tion, SO that the bead when closed on it will have a secure grip.
44 But in order that my invention may be clearly understood I shall now refer to the accompanying drawings in which Fig. 1 is a view of the lower portion of a drum and the spindle attached thereto in the manner described herein, Fig. 2 is a sectional view of the lower portion of a drum with the spindle having a chisel edged flange in position, but the bead not closed down, Fig. 3 is a similar view of the same parts with the joint completed, Fig. 4 is a similar view to Fig. 2 showing the flange recessed on its upper edge, Fig. 5 is a view of the same parts with the joint completed.