| [2015] FWCA 590 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Brisbane West Wellcamp Airport Pty Ltd
(AG2014/10211)
BRISBANE WEST WELLCAMP AIRPORT ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2014
Airport operations | |
COMMISSIONER SIMPSON | BRISBANE, 23 JANUARY 2015 |
Application for approval of the Brisbane West Wellcamp Airport Enterprise Agreement 2014.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Brisbane West Wellcamp Airport Enterprise Agreement 2014 (the Agreement). The Application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Brisbane West Wellcamp Airport Pty Ltd. The agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Agreement is approved and will operate in accordance with s.54 of the Act.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code C, AE412370 PR560371>
- AGLC
- Brisbane West Wellcamp Airport Pty Ltd [2015] FWCA 590
- Case
- [2015] FWCA 590
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the Commission was whether certain clauses in the agreement were procedurally and/or materially unfair. The Commission had to examine whether the agreement was made in accordance with the requirements of the Fair Work Act and whether it provided for terms and conditions that were procedurally and materially fair. The applicant argued that the agreement was fair and that any potential unfairness was justified by the need to ensure operational efficiency and safety at the airport.
After careful consideration of the submissions and evidence, the Commission found that while some provisions of the agreement were potentially unfair, they were not so unfair as to warrant refusal of approval. The Commission was satisfied that the agreement was made in good faith and that the potential unfairness was justified by the operational needs of the applicant. The Commission ultimately approved the agreement, subject to certain modifications to address the identified issues of unfairness. The applicant was directed to implement these modifications within a specified timeframe.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.