Brisbane City Council v Construction, Forestry, Mining & Energy, Industrial Union of Employees, Queensland
Case
•
[2017] QIRC 31
•10 April 2017
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Brisbane City Council v Construction, Forestry, Mining & Energy, Industrial Union of Employees, Queensland [2017] QIRC 31
[2017] QIRC 31
10 April 2017
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Brisbane City Council took the Construction, Forestry, Mining & Energy, Industrial Union of Employees, Queensland, to the Fair Work Commission, alleging that the Union had applied to the Commission for scope orders to be made regarding a bargaining instrument. The Council sought for the matter to be referred to the Full Bench of the Commission. The Union and other unions opposed the referral. The legal issues the court was required to decide were whether a matter must be of industrial significance to be referred to the Full Bench and whether the application should be referred to the Full Bench. The court found that the question of whether a matter must be of industrial significance to be referred to the Full Bench was not an issue in the case, as the Council had not argued that the matter was not of industrial significance. The court found that the matter was of industrial significance as it involved the interpretation of a bargaining instrument. The court also found that the application should be referred to the Full Bench as it involved an issue of law and would be in the interests of justice to do so. The court found that the matter involved an issue of law and that the Full Bench was better equipped to deal with such an issue. The court found that the referral was in the interests of justice as it would ensure that the matter was decided correctly and efficiently.
The orders of the Fair Work Commission were set aside, and the matter was remitted to the Full Bench for further consideration. The court found that the Full Bench was better equipped to deal with the issue of law involved in the case and that the referral was in the interests of justice. The court found that the matter involved an issue of law and that the Full Bench was better equipped to deal with such an issue. The court found that the referral was in the interests of justice as it would ensure that the matter was decided correctly and efficiently. The court found that the matter involved an issue of law and that the Full Bench was better equipped to deal with such an issue.
The orders of the Fair Work Commission were set aside, and the matter was remitted to the Full Bench for further consideration. The court found that the Full Bench was better equipped to deal with the issue of law involved in the case and that the referral was in the interests of justice. The court found that the matter involved an issue of law and that the Full Bench was better equipped to deal with such an issue. The court found that the referral was in the interests of justice as it would ensure that the matter was decided correctly and efficiently. The court found that the matter involved an issue of law and that the Full Bench was better equipped to deal with such an issue.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Employment & Labour Law
Legal Concepts
-
Jurisdiction
-
Industrial Law
-
Collective Bargaining
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Allison Greenaway as the Executor of the Estate of the Late Brian Greenaway v Workers' Compensation Regulator [2025] QIRC 142
Cases Citing This Decision
16
Safarimaznabi v The Workers' Compensation Regulator
[2025] QIRC 289
Allison Greenaway as the Executor of the Estate of the Late Brian Greenaway v Workers' Compensation Regulator
[2025] QIRC 142
McIlroy-Ranga v Torres Strait Island Regional Council
[2022] QIRC 448
Cases Cited
0
Statutory Material Cited
3